LEADER 02768naaaa2200385aa54500
001 604695
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20250627101611
006 aobe|e |||| 001 0d
007 ta
008 240129s1996 enkobe|e |||| 001 0deng c
020 |a1557863458
020 |a1557863482|q(pbk)
020 |a9781557863485
040 |aTTK
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
090 |aA.IX/7254
100 1 |aJohnson, Matthew,|d1962-
245 13|aAn archaeology of capitalism /|cMatthew Johnson.
250 |aFirst published.
260 |aOxford, UK ;|aCambridge, Mass. :|bBlackwell Publishers,|c1996.
300 |axiv, 244 sayfa :|bresim, harita, plan, şema, tıpkıbasım ;|c23 cm.
490 0 |aSocial archaeology
500 |aSözlük s. [213]-215.
500 |aİndeks s. [233]-244.
504 |aBibliyografya s. 216-232.
505 |tList of figures --|tPreface --|tIntroduction --|tEnduring Structures and Historical understanding --|tUnderstanding enclosure --|tHousing, fields, maps and cultures --|tOrdering the world --|tArchaeologies of authority --|tRedefining the domestic --|tThinking about objects --|tConclusion : Towards an archaeology of capitalism --|tGlossary --|tReferences --|tIndex.
520 |a“An Archaeology of Capitalism offers an account of landscape and material culture from the later Middle Ages to the beginnings of the Industrial Revolution. In tracing some of the roots of modernity back to the transformation of the countryside, this book seeks an innovative understanding of the transition between feudalism and capitalism, and does so through a unique synthesis of archaeology, economic, social and cultural history, historical geography and architectural history. Medieval and early modern archaeology has in the past focused on small-scale empirical contributions to the study of the period. The approach taken here is both wider-ranging and more ambitious. The author breaks down the dividing lines between archaeological and documentary evidence to provide a vivid reconstruction of pre-industrial material life and of the social and mental processes that came together in the post-medieval period in the transition towards modernity. Matthew Johnson is careful to avoid a simplifying evolutionary explanation, but rather sees the period in terms of a diversity of social and material practices evident in material traces - traces that survive and that, when reused in different contexts, came to mean different things.” --|cYayıncı.
650 4|aSosyal arkeoloji|zİngiltere|xTarih.
650 4|aMaddi kültür|zİngiltere|xTarih.
650 4|aFeodalizm|zİngiltere|xTarih.
650 4|aKapitalizm|zİngiltere|xTarih.
651 4|aİngiltere|xEski eserler.