LEADER 05198naaaa2200373aa54500
001 604797
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20250627100909
006 a||||e |||| 001 0d
007 ta
008 231207s2017 be ||||e |||| 001 0deng c
020 |a9789042933507
040 |aTTK
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
090 |aA.IX/7177
100 1 |aStrootman, Rolf,|d1968-
245 14|aThe birdcage of the muses :|bpatronage of the arts and sciences at the Ptolemaic Imperial Court, 305-222 BCE /|cby Rolf Strootman.
260 |aLeuven ;|aParis ;|aBristol, CT :|bPeeters,|c2017.
300 |avii, 183, [3] sayfa ;|c24 cm.
490 0 |aInterdisciplinary studies in ancient culture and religion ;|v17
500 |aİndeks s. [181-186].
504 |aBibliyografya s. [153]-179.
505 |g1.|tIntroduction.|tThe golden age of Ptolemaic Alexandria --|tPatronage and court society --|tHellenistic poetry as l’artpour l’art --|tUnderstanding Ptolemaic literary patronage --|tCourt and empire in the Ptolemaic World --|tUnderstanding the role of the court --|tHow this book is structured --|g2.|tThe historical background.|tThe Argead royal court --|tFrom Companions to Friends --|tCultural patronage before the Hellenistic Age --|tCultural patronage in the third century BCE --|tThe mouseion of Alexandria Conclusion --|g3.|tRoyal courts in the Hellenistic World.|tWhat is a court? --|tThe Queen at Court --|tCourt and empire --|tThe Friends of the King --|tThe Royal Council --|tCourt titles --|tThe Royal Pages --|tProximity to the throne --|tConflict and competition --|tConclusion --|g4.|tThe ties that bind : philia, xenia and gift exchange.|tFriendship and court society --|tGuest-friendship --|tHierarchy --|tBrokerage --|tGift Exchange --|tConclusion --|g5.|tPatrons and clients.|tWhy court patronage? --|tThe usefulness of court patronage --|tPrestige --|tCompetition --|tAccumulation and appropriation --|tSocial Cohesion --|tConclusion --|g6.|tPoets are a king’s best friends: the Hellenistic poet as royal philos.|tPoets and scholars as courtiers --|tPoetry and patron : the case of Theokritos and Hieron --|tReciprocity --|tCompetition and innovation --|tConclusion --|g7.|tPower Poetry : Images of empire in Alexandrian court poetry.|tPraising the king and queen --|tWorld Empire and Golden Age --|tFrom Zeus to Ptolemy --|tPeace and prosperity --|tHellenism and empire --|tConclusion --|g8.|tFrom polis to oikoumene : The imperial world view in scholarship and philosophy --|tPhilosophy --|tAstronomy --|tHistoriography, geography, ethnography --|tConclusion --|g9.|tConclusion : Patronage, court and empire --|tBibliography --|tIndex.
520 |a“In the third century BCE, the Ptolemaic imperial court at Alexandria was the unchallenged center of culture and learning in the Hellenistic world. Backed by the vast wealth and prestige of the Ptolemies, the city of Alexandria became the symbolic capital of the world, the main hub of a dynamic imperial network that stretched from the Indian Ocean to the Black Sea. Many poets, philosophers, inventors, geographers, and other men of letters migrated to that center to enjoy the generous patronage of the Ptolemies. The Birdcage of the Muses is the first book-length historical study of the golden age of Ptolemaic cultural and scientific patronage. Working from new approaches to premodern imperialism, Rolf Strootman reconsiders the significance of Hellenistic court poetry from the perspective of current empire studies and the sociological study of the court, arguing that artistic, scholarly and scientific production contributed to processes of elite integration in the heterogeneous imperial world system controlled by the Ptolemies. Rejecting the modernist view that poets, scholars and technicians were autonomous outsiders to court society, the author is able to place these men in the social milieu of the court, showing how their professional behavior was ruled by the same mechanisms of gift exchange, etiquette and competition that determined court society as a whole. The Hellenistic Age was a period of intensified globalization, and it was through the royal court that writers and scientists were able to gain access to the extensive elite networks that connected communities throughout the Mediterranean and beyond. Literary authors in particular contributed themselves to the growth of interconnectivity by creating a common 'Hellenistic' imperial culture and language, and through the expression of imperial themes, notably the idea that the civilized world was, or ought to be, a single oikoumene of which Alexandria was the glorious, magnetic heart.” --|cYayıncı.
650 4|aPtolemaios Hanedanı, MÖ 305-30.
650 4|aPtolemaios Hanedanı, MÖ 305-222|xSanat.
650 4|aPtolemaios Hanedanı, MÖ 305-222|xBilim.
650 4|aSaray ve saray mensupları|zMısır|xİskenderiye Valiliği|yMÖ 1. binyıl.
650 4|aHelenistik sanat|zMısır|xİskenderiye Valiliği|yMÖ 1. binyıl.
650 4|aBilim|zMısır|xİskenderiye Valiliği|yMÖ 1. binyıl.
651 4|aMısır|xYönetim ve politikalar|zMÖ 332-30.