LEADER 03292naaaa2200409aa54500
001 604835
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20250303173106
006 aoc||e |||| 001 0d
007 ta
008 240131s2022 enkoc||e |||| 001 0deng c
020 |a9780755600397|q(HB)
020 |a9780755600380|q(paperback)
020 |a9780755600410|q(ePDF)
020 |a9780755600403|q(eBook)
040 |aTTK
041 |aeng
049 |aTTK
090 |aA.IX/7268
100 1 |aLow, David.
245 10|aPicturing the Ottoman Armenian world :|bphotography in Erzurum, Harput, Van and beyond /|cDavid Low.
250 |aFirst published in Great Britain.
260 |aLondon :|bI.B. Tauris,|c2022.
300 |axvi, 250 sayfa :|bresim, portre, tıpkıbasım ;|c24 cm.
490 0 |aArmenians in the modern and early modern world
500 |aİndeks s. [246]-250.
504 |aBibliyografya s. [228]-245.
504 |aBibliyografik notlar s. [190]-227.
505 |tList of figures --|tAcknowledgements --|tNotes on names and transliteration --|tPrelude : The Unfixed World --|tEscaping Constantinople, or a little history of photography in the Ottoman Empire --|tApproaching the provinces, via Trebizond --|tBeginning in Erzurum --|tLeaving Harput --|tReturning to Van --|tLooking forward, looking back --|tSailing away from a conclusion --|tNotes --|tBibliography --|tIndex.
520 |a“The Armenian contribution to Ottoman photography is supposedly well known, with histories documenting the famous Ottoman Armenian-run studios of the imperial capital that produced Orientalist visions for tourists and images of modernity for a domestic elite. Neglected, however, have been the practitioners of the eastern provinces where the majority of Ottoman Armenians were to be found, with the result that their role in the medium has been obscured and wider Armenian history and experience distorted. Photography in the Ottoman East was grounded in very different concerns, with the work of studios rooted in the seismic social, political and cultural shifts that reshaped the region and Armenian lives during the empire's last decades. The first study of its kind, this book examines photographic activity in three sites on the Armenian plateau: Erzurum, Harput and Van. Arguing that local photographic practices were marked by the dominant activities and movements of these places, it describes a medium bound up in educational endeavours, mass migration and revolutionary politics. The camera both responded to and became the instrument of these phenomena. Light is shone on previously unknown practitioners and, more vitally, a perspective gained on the communities that they served. The book suggests that by contemplating the ways in which photographs were made, used, circulated and seen, we might form a picture of the Ottoman Armenian world.” --|cYayıncı.
650 4|aFotoğrafçılık ve tarih.
650 4|aFotoğrafçılık|zTürkiye|zHarput|xTarih|y20. yy.
650 4|aFotoğrafçılık|zTürkiye|zErzurum|xTarih|y20. yy.
650 4|aFotoğrafçılık|zTürkiye|zVan|xTarih|y20. yy.
650 4|aErmeniler|zTürkiye|xTarih|y20. yy.
650 4|aFotoğrafçılık|zTürkiye|xTarih|zOsmanlı İmparatorluğu, 1299-1918.