LEADER 02672naaaa2200373aa54500
001 604837
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20250627100710
006 ad|||e |||| 001 0d
007 ta
008 240131s2023 enkd|||e |||| 001 0deng c
020 |a9780755646470|q(HB)
020 |a9780755646432|q(HB)
020 |a9780755646463|q(ePDF)
020 |a9780755646456|q(eBook)
040 |aTTK
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
090 |aA.IX/7266
100 1 |aGourisse, Benjamin,|d1980-
245 10|aPolitical violence in Turkey, 1975-1980 the state at stake /|cBenjamin Gourisse.
260 |aLondon :|bI.B. Tauris,|c2023.
300 |aviii, 224 sayfa :|bgrafik, tablo ;|c24 cm.
490 0 |aContemporary Turkey
500 |aİndeks s. [221]-224.
504 |aBibliyografya s. [209]-220.
504 |aBibliyografik notlar s. [170]-202.
505 |tList of illustrations --|tAcronyms and Abbreviations --|tIntroduction --|tThe State at stake --|tMovements in conflict --|tThe accumulation and circulation of resources --|tCapturing resources and politicizing the State --|tThe spread of protest movement --|tThe escalation in violence --|tThe effects of violence on political contests --|tConclusion --|tNotes --|tOutline chronology of the events, 1961-1980 --|tBibliography --|tIndex.
520 |a“This book examines the period of political violence in Turkey between 12 March 1971 and 12 September 1980. It sets out a close analysis of the tactics used by the various protagonists in the conflict, showing how they took over public institutions, the first of which was the police. This book challenges the myth of a 'strong' Turkish state viewed as authoritative and autonomous from society, instead reflecting a state that was unable to contain the political mobilisation actually taking place. In the book, Benjamin Gourisse analyses the structure, mobilisation, and strategies of antagonistic radical political groups caught up in this dynamic of violence, including the far-left organisations and the Nationalist Movement, comprising the Nationalist Movement Party and its satellite organisations. Gourisse demonstrates that from 1975 to 1980, the state was never “out of play”. Quite the contrary, in fact, for its institutions, together with the practices, beliefs, and representations of their members and users, were central to the processes constituting the crisis.” --|cYayıncı.
650 4|aSiyaset sosyolojisi|zTürkiye.
650 4|aSiyasi krizler|zTürkiye|y1970-1980.
650 4|aSiyasi partiler|zTürkiye|y1970-1980.
650 4|aŞiddet, siyasi|xSosyoloji|zTürkiye|y1970-1980.