LEADER 03260nam a22004935i 4500
001 608658
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20250627072548
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 171012s2017 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783319649528|9978-3-319-64952-8
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-319-64952-8|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aQ124.6-127.2
072 7|aPDX|2bicssc
072 7|aSCI034000|2bisacsh
072 7|aPDX|2thema
082 04|a509|223
090 |aDK/1331
100 1 |aLarsen, Kristine.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 14|aThe Women Who Popularized Geology in the 19th Century|h[electronic resource] /|cby Kristine Larsen.
250 |a1st ed. 2017.
264 1|aCham :|bSpringer International Publishing :|bImprint: Springer,|c2017.
300 |aVIII, 216 p. 8 illus., 1 illus. in color.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aThe Status of the Geological Sciences Circa 1800 -- The Popularization of Science -- Jane Haldimand Marcet (1769 – 1858): The Queen of the Familiar Format -- Maria Hack (1777 – 1844): Contrivance and Conversation -- Jane Kilby Welsh (1783 – 1853): Faith and Family -- Delvalle Lowry (1800 – 59): Apprentice and Author -- Delia Woodruff Godding (1812 – 61): Poetry and Perseverance -- Almira Hart Lincoln Phelps (1793 – 1884): Textbooks and the Female Seminary -- Alternatives to the Familiar Format -- The Extinction of the Familiar Format.
520 |aThe female authors highlighted in this monograph represent a special breed of science writer, women who not only synthesized the science of their day (often drawing upon their own direct experience in the laboratory, field, classroom, and/or public lecture hall), but used their works to simultaneously educate, entertain, and, in many cases, evangelize. Women played a central role in the popularization of science in the 19th century, as penning such works (written for an audience of other women and children) was considered proper "women's work." Many of these writers excelled in a particular literary technique known as the "familiar format," in which science is described in the form of a conversation between characters, especially women and children. However, the biological sciences were considered more “feminine” than the natural sciences (such as astronomy and physics), hence the number of geological “conversations” was limited. This, in turn, makes the few that were completed all the more crucial to analyze.
650 0|aScience|xHistory.
650 0|aLiterature|xHistory and criticism.
650 0|aEarth sciences.
650 14|aHistory of Science.
650 24|aLiterary History.
650 24|aEarth Sciences.
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319649511
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319649535
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319879093
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64952-8
912 |aZDB-2-HTY
912 |aZDB-2-SXH
950 |aHistory (SpringerNature-41172)
950 |aHistory (R0) (SpringerNature-43722)