LEADER 04229nam a22005175i 4500
001 609105
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20250627071051
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210113s2021 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783030625399|9978-3-030-62539-9
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-030-62539-9|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aD1-2027
072 7|aJFCX|2bicssc
072 7|aHIS000000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJBCC9|2thema
082 04|a001.09|223
090 |aDK/1777
100 1 |aMarshall, Catherine.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aPolitical Deference in a Democratic Age|h[electronic resource] :|bBritish Politics and the Constitution from the Eighteenth Century to Brexit /|cby Catherine Marshall.
250 |a1st ed. 2021.
264 1|aCham :|bSpringer International Publishing :|bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,|c2021.
300 |aX, 354 p. 1 illus. in color.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aChapter 1: Introduction: Why ‘Deference’? -- Part I: Theory of Deference from the Eighteenth Century to 1911 – Definitions in Context -- Chapter 2: The Constitution of Political Deference -- Chapter 3: Deference and the Politics of Notables -- Chapter 4: Walter Bagehot, The ‘Darwin of Deference’ -- Chapter 5: The Dilemma(s) of Voluntary Deference in the Fin de Siècle -- Part II: The Practice of Deference in a Democratic Age – A User’s Guide -- Chapter 6: The Challenges to Voluntary Deference (1911–1945) -- Chapter 7: Voluntary Deference in Crisis (1945–1972) -- Chapter 8: The Rejection of Rational deference (1973–1997) -- Chapter 9: The ‘Afterlife’ of Deference (1997–2016) -- Chapter 10: Conclusion: Deference for the Democratic Age.
520 |aThis book explores the concept of deference as used by historians and political scientists. Often confused and judged to be outdated, it shows how deference remains central to understanding British politics to the present day. This study aims to make sense of how political deference has functioned in different periods and how it has played a crucial role in legitimising British politics. It shows how deference sustained what are essentially English institutions, those which dominated the Union well into the second half of the twentieth century until the post-1997 constitutional transformations under New Labour. While many dismiss political and institutional deference as having died out, this book argues that a number of recent political decisions – including the vote in favour of Brexit in June 2016 – are the result of a deferential way of thinking that has persisted through the democratic changes of the twentieth century. Combining close readings of theoretical texts with analysesof specific legal changes and historical events, the book charts the development of deference from the eighteenth century through to the present day. Rather than offering a comprehensive history of deference, it picks out key moments that show the changing nature of deference, both as a concept and as a political force. Catherine Marshall is Professor of British Studies at CY Cergy Paris Université, France. Her research focuses mainly on the history of ideas in mid-Victorian England and the legacy of some of those ideas on twentieth and twenty-first century Britain. She teaches British history and the history of political ideas.
650 0|aIntellectual life|xHistory.
650 0|aWorld politics.
650 0|aGreat Britain|xHistory.
650 0|aLaw|xHistory.
650 14|aIntellectual History.
650 24|aPolitical History.
650 24|aHistory of Britain and Ireland.
650 24|aLegal History.
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783030625382
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783030625405
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783030625412
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62539-9
912 |aZDB-2-HTY
912 |aZDB-2-SXH
950 |aHistory (SpringerNature-41172)
950 |aHistory (R0) (SpringerNature-43722)