LEADER 03709nam a22006135i 4500
001 610190
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20250627063413
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 231116s2023 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783031464676|9978-3-031-46467-6
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-031-46467-6|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aK7000-7720.22
072 7|aLB|2bicssc
072 7|aLAM|2bicssc
072 7|aLAW051000|2bisacsh
072 7|aLB|2thema
072 7|aLAM|2thema
082 04|a340.9|223
090 |aDK/2862
100 1 |aShang, Yifan.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 12|aA Historical and Legal Comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit|h[electronic resource] /|cby Yifan Shang.
250 |a1st ed. 2023.
264 1|aCham :|bSpringer International Publishing :|bImprint: Springer,|c2023.
300 |aVIII, 129 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aIus Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,|x2214-9902 ;|v110
505 0 |a1. Introduction -- 2. Methodology -- 3. Similarities.-4. Differences -- 5. Conclusion.
520 |aThis book explores the historical and legal importance of two principles, Quod Omnes Tangit, and Tianxia Wei Gong, which have played significant roles in European and Chinese political and legal history. While Quod Omnes Tangit has been thoroughly researched, Tianxia Wei Gong has not been systematically examined. This thesis fills this void and connects these two principles for the first time. Quod Omnes Tangit was initially introduced in Justinian's Codex Civil, while Tianxia Wei Gong originated from Liji, one of the books in a key series of works by Confucius. Liji is comparable to the Thora in the Old Testament and is considered as important as law in Chinese legal history. Both principles have undergone comparable developmental processes, with scholars contributing to their reinterpretation. This book thoroughly examines the interpretations of individual scholars, with particular attention given to Liang Qichao, who is the only one to have mentioned both Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit. The book also provides an explanation for the original discrepancies in their concepts, particularly their methodologies in distributing and legitimizing rights. This research will be of interest to legal philosophers and historians in both the Western and Eastern worlds, legal practitioners and policymakers, and researchers seeking to explain current events and explore fundamental differences between the East and West.
650 0|aPrivate international law.
650 0|aConflict of laws.
650 0|aInternational law.
650 0|aComparative law.
650 0|aLaw|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aLaw|xHistory.
650 0|aAsia|xHistory.
650 0|aPhilosophy, Chinese.
650 14|aPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
650 24|aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
650 24|aAsian History.
650 24|aChinese Philosophy.
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783031464669
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783031464683
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783031464690
830 0|aIus Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,|x2214-9902 ;|v110
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46467-6
912 |aZDB-2-HTY
912 |aZDB-2-SXH
950 |aHistory (SpringerNature-41172)
950 |aHistory (R0) (SpringerNature-43722)