LEADER 04137nam a2200529Ii 4500
001 795540
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260123005237
006 m o d
007 cr
008 180928s2018 fluab ob 001 0 eng d
020 |a9781315191126|q(e-book : PDF)
035 |a(OCoLC)1048943029
040 |aFlBoTFG|cFlBoTFG|erda
041 1 |aeng
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aJK96.A3|bM64 2019
072 7|aPOL|x000000 |2bisacsh
072 7|aPOL|x016000 |2bisacsh
072 7|aHIS|x036000 |2bisacsh
072 7|aJP |2bicscc
082 04|a324.6/20973|223
100 1 |aMoeller, Justin,|eauthor.
245 10|aRemoval of the Property Qualification for Voting in the United States :|bStrategy and Suffrage /|cby Justin Moeller and Ronald F. King.
250 |a1st edition.
264 1|aBoca Raton, FL :|bRoutledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis,|c2018.
300 |a1 online resource (142 pages) :|b4 illustrations, text file, PDF.
336 |atext|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|2rdacarrier
490 1 |aRoutledge Research in American Politics and Governance
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 00|t1. Introduction: Property, Participation, and the Routes to Reform -- --2. The Politics of Partisan Preemption: Pennsylvania, Georgia, and New Hampshire -- --3. The Politics of Partisan Cooptation: Delaware, South Carolina, Massachusetts, and Virginia -- --4. The Politics of Partisan Replacement: Maryland, New Jersey, Connecticut, New York, and North Carolina -- --5. The Politics of Partisan Rejection: Rhode Island -- --6. Strategic Incentives and Franchise Reform: An Event History Analysis -- --7. Conclusion: The Expansion and Contraction of Democratic Rights -- --Appendix: Overview of Property Restrictions on Suffrage.
520 3 |aIn Colonial America, democracy was centered in provincial assemblies and based on the collection of neighbors whose freehold ownership made them permanent stakeholders in the community. The removal of the property qualification for voting in the United States occurred over three-quarters of a century and was among the more important events in the history of democratization, functioning to shift voting from a corporate privilege toward a human right.Moving beyond the standard histories of property standard histories of property qualification removal, Justin Moeller and Ronald F. King adopt the theories and methods of social science to discover underlying patterns and regularities, attempting a more systematic understanding of subject. While no historical event has a single cause, party consolidation and party competition provided a necessary mechanism, making background factors politically relevant. No change in franchise rules could occur without the explicit consent of incumbent politicians, always sensitive to the anticipated impact. Moeller and King argue that political parties acted strategically, accepting or rejecting removal of the property qualification as a means of advancing their electoral position. The authors identify four different variants of the strategic calculation variable, significantly helping to explain both the temporal differences across states and the pattern of contestation with each state individually.
530 |aAlso available in print format.
650 7|aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / General.|2bisacsh
650 7|aHISTORY / United States / General.|2bisacsh
650 0|aSuffrage|zUnited States|xHistory|y18th century.
650 0|aSuffrage|zUnited States|xHistory|y19th century.
650 0|aVoting|zUnited States|xHistory|y18th century.
650 0|aVoting|zUnited States|xHistory|y19th century.
650 0|aProperty|xSocial aspects|zUnited States|xHistory.
655 0|aElectronic books.
700 1 |aKing, Ronald F.,|eauthor.
710 2 |aTaylor and Francis.
776 08|iPrint version: |z9781138726949(Hardback)
830 0|aRoutledge Research in American Politics and Governance.
856 40|uhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315191126|zClick here to view.
901 |aTaylor & Francis