LEADER 03736nam a22005175i 4500
001 805625
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127000510
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 120914s2013 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789400745933|9978-94-007-4593-3
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-007-4593-3|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aK201-487
050 4|aK140-165
072 7|aLAB|2bicssc
072 7|aLAW000000|2bisacsh
072 7|aLAB|2thema
082 04|a340.1|223
090 |aDK/6941
245 14|aThe Planning Theory of Law|h[electronic resource] :|bA Critical Reading /|cedited by Damiano Canale, Giovanni Tuzet.
250 |a1st ed. 2013.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2013.
300 |aXVIII, 206 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aLaw and Philosophy Library,|x2215-0315 ;|v100
505 0 |a100th edition announcement -- Authors Biographies -- Introduction; Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet -- 1. Looking for the Nature of Law: On Shapiro’s Challenge; Damiano Canale -- 2. The Possibility Puzzle and Legal Positivism; Francesca Poggi -- 3. What is Wrong with Legal Realism?; Giovanni Tuzet -- 4. Rule of Recognition, Convention and Obligation. What Shapiro Can Still Learn from Hart’s Mistakes; Aldo Schiavello -- 5. Legality: Between Purposes and Functions; Diego Papayannis -- 6. What Can Plans Do for Legal Theory?; Bruno Celano -- 7. Ruling Platitudes, Old Metaphysics, and a Few Misunderstandings about Legal Positivism.; Pierluigi Chiassoni -- 8. Theoretical Disagreements. A Restatement of Legal Positivism; Jordi Ferrer and Giovanni Battista Ratti -- 9. ‘What’s the Plan?’ On Interpretation and Meta-interpretation in Scott Shapiro’s Legality; Giorgio Pino.
520 |aThis collection of essays is the outcome of a workshop with Scott Shapiro on The Planning Theory of Law that took place in December 2009 at Bocconi University. It brings together a group of scholars who wrote their contributions to the workshop on a preliminary draft of Shapiro’s Legality. Then, after the workshop, they wrote their final essays on the published version of the book. The contributions clearly highlight the difference of the continental and civil law perspective from the common law background of Shapiro but at the same time the volume tries to bridge the gap between the two. The essays provide a critical reading of the planning theory of law, highlighting its merits on the one hand and objecting to some parts of it on the other hand. Each contribution discusses in detail a chapter of Shapiro’s book and together they cover the whole of Shapiro’s theory. So the book presents a balanced and insightful discussion of the arguments of Legality.
650 0|aLaw|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aLaw|xHistory.
650 14|aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Law.
700 1 |aCanale, Damiano.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aTuzet, Giovanni.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400745926
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400745940
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401783941
830 0|aLaw and Philosophy Library,|x2215-0315 ;|v100
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4593-3
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXLC
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aLaw and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)