Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Language Processing [electronic resource] / edited by M. de Vincenzi, V. Lombardo.
Erişim Adresi
ISBN
9789401139496
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/7067
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 2000.
Yayın Bilgisi
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2000.
Fiziksel Niteleme
VI, 260 p. online resource.
Dizi
Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 2215-1788 ; 25
İçindekiler Notu
Garden Path Re-Analysis: Attach (Anyway) and Revision as Last Resort -- Lowering across Languages -- Cross-Linguistic Studies of the Late Closure Strategy: French and Italian -- Resolving Syntactic Ambiguities: Cross-Linguistic Differences? -- Architectures and Mechanisms for Sentence Processing: Is Syntactic Parsing a Form of Lexical Ambiguity Resolution? -- The Role of Case and Number Features in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution -- A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Discourse Context and Syntactic Processing in Language Production -- Conceptual Effects in Sentence Priming: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective.
Özet, vb.
Recent studies in psycho linguistics have ranged through a variety of languages. In this trend, which has no precedent, studies in language processing have followed studies in language acquisition and theoretical linguistics in considering language universals in a broader scope than only in English. Since the beginning of the century, studies in language acquisition have produced a vast body of data from a number of Indoeuropean languages, and the emphasis on the universal has preceded the emphasis on the particular (see (Slobin 1985) for a review). Nowadays, the research in the field advances by means of a continuous linking between the cross-linguistic uniformities and the individual language influences on development. The level of language universals is continuously refined as the data from a number of languages contribute to the elaboration of a more distinctive picture of the language of children. The first cross-linguistic studies in theoretical linguistics appeared at the end of the seventies. Within the Chomskian paradigm, the reference to the Romance languages caused a shift from a rule-based toward a principle-based formalism (Chomsky 1981, 1995); within alternative theories, the reduced prominence of the pure phrase structure component in favor of the lexicon and/or the functional relations (see, e.g., Lexical Functional Grammar (Bresnan 1982), Relational Grammar (Perlmutter 1983)) sought empirical support in languages exhibiting deep structural differences with respect to English (e.g. Bantu, Malayalam, Romance and Slavic languages Warlpiri). The M. De Vincenzi and V. Lombardo (eds.), Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Language Processing, 1-19.
Konu
Psycholinguistics.
Cognitive psychology.
Computational linguistics.
Artificial intelligence.
Psycholinguistics and Cognitive Lingusitics.
Cognitive Psychology.
Computational Linguistics.
Artificial Intelligence.
Cognitive psychology.
Computational linguistics.
Artificial intelligence.
Psycholinguistics and Cognitive Lingusitics.
Cognitive Psychology.
Computational Linguistics.
Artificial Intelligence.
Diğer Yazarlar
Kurum Adı
Eseri Alıntıla
Referansları kullanmadan önce gözden geçirmeniz ve varsa gerekli düzeltmeleri yapmanız önerilir.
Dijital Kaynak
MARC Görünümü
LEADER 05122nam a22006135i 4500
001 805752
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127000736
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s2000 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401139496|9978-94-011-3949-6
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-011-3949-6|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aP37-37.5
072 7|aCFD|2bicssc
072 7|aLAN009040|2bisacsh
072 7|aCFD|2thema
082 04|a401.9|223
090 |aDK/7067
245 10|aCross-Linguistic Perspectives on Language Processing|h[electronic resource] /|cedited by M. de Vincenzi, V. Lombardo.
250 |a1st ed. 2000.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2000.
300 |aVI, 260 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aStudies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics,|x2215-1788 ;|v25
505 0 |aGarden Path Re-Analysis: Attach (Anyway) and Revision as Last Resort -- Lowering across Languages -- Cross-Linguistic Studies of the Late Closure Strategy: French and Italian -- Resolving Syntactic Ambiguities: Cross-Linguistic Differences? -- Architectures and Mechanisms for Sentence Processing: Is Syntactic Parsing a Form of Lexical Ambiguity Resolution? -- The Role of Case and Number Features in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution -- A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Discourse Context and Syntactic Processing in Language Production -- Conceptual Effects in Sentence Priming: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective.
520 |aRecent studies in psycho linguistics have ranged through a variety of languages. In this trend, which has no precedent, studies in language processing have followed studies in language acquisition and theoretical linguistics in considering language universals in a broader scope than only in English. Since the beginning of the century, studies in language acquisition have produced a vast body of data from a number of Indoeuropean languages, and the emphasis on the universal has preceded the emphasis on the particular (see (Slobin 1985) for a review). Nowadays, the research in the field advances by means of a continuous linking between the cross-linguistic uniformities and the individual language influences on development. The level of language universals is continuously refined as the data from a number of languages contribute to the elaboration of a more distinctive picture of the language of children. The first cross-linguistic studies in theoretical linguistics appeared at the end of the seventies. Within the Chomskian paradigm, the reference to the Romance languages caused a shift from a rule-based toward a principle-based formalism (Chomsky 1981, 1995); within alternative theories, the reduced prominence of the pure phrase structure component in favor of the lexicon and/or the functional relations (see, e.g., Lexical Functional Grammar (Bresnan 1982), Relational Grammar (Perlmutter 1983)) sought empirical support in languages exhibiting deep structural differences with respect to English (e.g. Bantu, Malayalam, Romance and Slavic languages Warlpiri). The M. De Vincenzi and V. Lombardo (eds.), Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Language Processing, 1-19.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aPsycholinguistics.
650 0|aCognitive psychology.
650 0|aComputational linguistics.
650 0|aArtificial intelligence.
650 14|aPsycholinguistics and Cognitive Lingusitics.
650 24|aCognitive Psychology.
650 24|aComputational Linguistics.
650 24|aArtificial Intelligence.
700 1 |ade Vincenzi, M.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aLombardo, V.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780792361466
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402002922
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401139502
830 0|aStudies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics,|x2215-1788 ;|v25
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3949-6
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXS
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aSocial Sciences (R0) (SpringerNature-43726)
001 805752
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127000736
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s2000 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401139496|9978-94-011-3949-6
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-011-3949-6|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aP37-37.5
072 7|aCFD|2bicssc
072 7|aLAN009040|2bisacsh
072 7|aCFD|2thema
082 04|a401.9|223
090 |aDK/7067
245 10|aCross-Linguistic Perspectives on Language Processing|h[electronic resource] /|cedited by M. de Vincenzi, V. Lombardo.
250 |a1st ed. 2000.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2000.
300 |aVI, 260 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aStudies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics,|x2215-1788 ;|v25
505 0 |aGarden Path Re-Analysis: Attach (Anyway) and Revision as Last Resort -- Lowering across Languages -- Cross-Linguistic Studies of the Late Closure Strategy: French and Italian -- Resolving Syntactic Ambiguities: Cross-Linguistic Differences? -- Architectures and Mechanisms for Sentence Processing: Is Syntactic Parsing a Form of Lexical Ambiguity Resolution? -- The Role of Case and Number Features in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution -- A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Discourse Context and Syntactic Processing in Language Production -- Conceptual Effects in Sentence Priming: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective.
520 |aRecent studies in psycho linguistics have ranged through a variety of languages. In this trend, which has no precedent, studies in language processing have followed studies in language acquisition and theoretical linguistics in considering language universals in a broader scope than only in English. Since the beginning of the century, studies in language acquisition have produced a vast body of data from a number of Indoeuropean languages, and the emphasis on the universal has preceded the emphasis on the particular (see (Slobin 1985) for a review). Nowadays, the research in the field advances by means of a continuous linking between the cross-linguistic uniformities and the individual language influences on development. The level of language universals is continuously refined as the data from a number of languages contribute to the elaboration of a more distinctive picture of the language of children. The first cross-linguistic studies in theoretical linguistics appeared at the end of the seventies. Within the Chomskian paradigm, the reference to the Romance languages caused a shift from a rule-based toward a principle-based formalism (Chomsky 1981, 1995); within alternative theories, the reduced prominence of the pure phrase structure component in favor of the lexicon and/or the functional relations (see, e.g., Lexical Functional Grammar (Bresnan 1982), Relational Grammar (Perlmutter 1983)) sought empirical support in languages exhibiting deep structural differences with respect to English (e.g. Bantu, Malayalam, Romance and Slavic languages Warlpiri). The M. De Vincenzi and V. Lombardo (eds.), Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Language Processing, 1-19.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aPsycholinguistics.
650 0|aCognitive psychology.
650 0|aComputational linguistics.
650 0|aArtificial intelligence.
650 14|aPsycholinguistics and Cognitive Lingusitics.
650 24|aCognitive Psychology.
650 24|aComputational Linguistics.
650 24|aArtificial Intelligence.
700 1 |ade Vincenzi, M.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aLombardo, V.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780792361466
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402002922
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401139502
830 0|aStudies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics,|x2215-1788 ;|v25
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3949-6
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXS
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aSocial Sciences (R0) (SpringerNature-43726)
Materyaller
Depodan talep edilen materyal sadece kütüphane içerisinde kullanılmaktadır.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
