Past and Present Interactions in Legal Reasoning and Logic [electronic resource] / edited by Matthias Armgardt, Patrice Canivez, Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet.
Erişim Adresi
ISBN
9783319160214
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/7070
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 2015.
Yayın Bilgisi
Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2015.
Fiziksel Niteleme
XI, 270 p. 34 illus. online resource.
Dizi
Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences, 2214-9139 ; 7
İçindekiler Notu
General Introduction; Patrice Canivez and Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Part 1. Roman Law and Logic -- Proculus on the Meanings of OR and the Types of Disjunction; Karlheinz Hülser -- Disjunctive Statements in Roman Legal Arguments; Markus Winkler -- Part 2. Leibniz, Law and Logic -- Presumptions and Conjectures in Leibniz’s Legal Theory; Matthias Armgardt -- Suspensive Condition & Dynamic Epistemic Logic; Sebastien Magnier -- The Rhetor’s Dilemma: Leibniz’s Approach to an Ancient Case; Bettine Jankowski -- Part 3. Current Interactions between Law and Logic -- On Hypothetical Judgements and Leibniz’s Notion of Conditional Right; Shahid Rahman -- Legal Fictions, Assumptions and Comparisons; Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Reasoning with Form & Content; Juliele Sievers and Sebastien Magnier -- Note on a Second Order Game in Legal Practice; Reinhard Z. Bengez -- Conflict of Norms and Conflict of Values in Law; Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet -- The Service Contract (Contrat d´Entreprise); Juliette Sénéchal.
Özet, vb.
This volume explores the relation between legal reasoning and logic from both a historical and a systematic perspective. The topics addressed include, among others, conditional legal acts, disjunctions in legal acts, presumptions and conjectures, conflicts of values, Jørgensen´s Dilemma, the Rhetor´s Dilemma, the theory of legal fictions, and the categorization of contracts. The unifying problematic of these contributions concerns the conditional structures and, more particularly, the relationship between legal theory and legal reasoning in the context of conditions. The contributions in this work constitute the first results of the ANR-DFG joint research project “JuriLog” (Jurisprudence and Logic), which aims at fostering the cooperation between legal scholars and philosophers. On the one hand, lawyers and legal scholars have an interest in emphasizing the logical character of legal reasoning. In this respect, the present enquiry examines the question of how logic, especially newer forms of dialogical logic, can be made fruitful as a significant area of philosophy for jurisprudence and legal practice. On the other hand, logicians find in legal reasoning a striving towards clear definitions and inference-procedures that is relevant to their discipline. In order to fully understand such reciprocal relationships, it is necessary to bridge the gap between law, logic and philosophy in contemporary academic research. The essays collected in this volume all work towards this common goal. The book is divided in three sections. In the first part, the strong relation betweenRoman Law and logic is explored with respect to the analysis of disjunctive statements in legal acts. The second part focuses on Leibniz´s legal theory. The third part, finally, is dedicated to current interactions between law and logic.
Konu
Law __ Philosophy.
Law __ History.
Logic.
Applied linguistics.
Knowledge, Sociology of.
Philosophy of Law.
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
Logic.
Applied Linguistics.
Sociology of Knowledge and Discourse.
Law __ History.
Logic.
Applied linguistics.
Knowledge, Sociology of.
Philosophy of Law.
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
Logic.
Applied Linguistics.
Sociology of Knowledge and Discourse.
Kurum Adı
Eseri Alıntıla
Referansları kullanmadan önce gözden geçirmeniz ve varsa gerekli düzeltmeleri yapmanız önerilir.
Dijital Kaynak
MARC Görünümü
LEADER 05246nam a22005895i 4500
001 805755
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127000739
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 150518s2015 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783319160214|9978-3-319-16021-4
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-319-16021-4|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aK201-487
072 7|aLAB|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI000000|2bisacsh
072 7|aLAB|2thema
082 04|a340.1|223
090 |aDK/7070
245 10|aPast and Present Interactions in Legal Reasoning and Logic|h[electronic resource] /|cedited by Matthias Armgardt, Patrice Canivez, Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet.
250 |a1st ed. 2015.
264 1|aCham :|bSpringer International Publishing :|bImprint: Springer,|c2015.
300 |aXI, 270 p. 34 illus.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aLogic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences,|x2214-9139 ;|v7
505 0 |aGeneral Introduction; Patrice Canivez and Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Part 1. Roman Law and Logic -- Proculus on the Meanings of OR and the Types of Disjunction; Karlheinz Hülser -- Disjunctive Statements in Roman Legal Arguments; Markus Winkler -- Part 2. Leibniz, Law and Logic -- Presumptions and Conjectures in Leibniz’s Legal Theory; Matthias Armgardt -- Suspensive Condition & Dynamic Epistemic Logic; Sebastien Magnier -- The Rhetor’s Dilemma: Leibniz’s Approach to an Ancient Case; Bettine Jankowski -- Part 3. Current Interactions between Law and Logic -- On Hypothetical Judgements and Leibniz’s Notion of Conditional Right; Shahid Rahman -- Legal Fictions, Assumptions and Comparisons; Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Reasoning with Form & Content; Juliele Sievers and Sebastien Magnier -- Note on a Second Order Game in Legal Practice; Reinhard Z. Bengez -- Conflict of Norms and Conflict of Values in Law; Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet -- The Service Contract (Contrat d´Entreprise); Juliette Sénéchal.
520 |aThis volume explores the relation between legal reasoning and logic from both a historical and a systematic perspective. The topics addressed include, among others, conditional legal acts, disjunctions in legal acts, presumptions and conjectures, conflicts of values, Jørgensen´s Dilemma, the Rhetor´s Dilemma, the theory of legal fictions, and the categorization of contracts. The unifying problematic of these contributions concerns the conditional structures and, more particularly, the relationship between legal theory and legal reasoning in the context of conditions. The contributions in this work constitute the first results of the ANR-DFG joint research project “JuriLog” (Jurisprudence and Logic), which aims at fostering the cooperation between legal scholars and philosophers. On the one hand, lawyers and legal scholars have an interest in emphasizing the logical character of legal reasoning. In this respect, the present enquiry examines the question of how logic, especially newer forms of dialogical logic, can be made fruitful as a significant area of philosophy for jurisprudence and legal practice. On the other hand, logicians find in legal reasoning a striving towards clear definitions and inference-procedures that is relevant to their discipline. In order to fully understand such reciprocal relationships, it is necessary to bridge the gap between law, logic and philosophy in contemporary academic research. The essays collected in this volume all work towards this common goal. The book is divided in three sections. In the first part, the strong relation betweenRoman Law and logic is explored with respect to the analysis of disjunctive statements in legal acts. The second part focuses on Leibniz´s legal theory. The third part, finally, is dedicated to current interactions between law and logic.
650 0|aLaw|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aLaw|xHistory.
650 0|aLogic.
650 0|aApplied linguistics.
650 0|aKnowledge, Sociology of.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Law.
650 24|aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
650 24|aLogic.
650 24|aApplied Linguistics.
650 24|aSociology of Knowledge and Discourse.
700 1 |aArmgardt, Matthias.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aCanivez, Patrice.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aChassagnard-Pinet, Sandrine.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319160207
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319160221
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319359250
830 0|aLogic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences,|x2214-9139 ;|v7
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16021-4
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
001 805755
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127000739
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 150518s2015 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783319160214|9978-3-319-16021-4
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-319-16021-4|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aK201-487
072 7|aLAB|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI000000|2bisacsh
072 7|aLAB|2thema
082 04|a340.1|223
090 |aDK/7070
245 10|aPast and Present Interactions in Legal Reasoning and Logic|h[electronic resource] /|cedited by Matthias Armgardt, Patrice Canivez, Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet.
250 |a1st ed. 2015.
264 1|aCham :|bSpringer International Publishing :|bImprint: Springer,|c2015.
300 |aXI, 270 p. 34 illus.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aLogic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences,|x2214-9139 ;|v7
505 0 |aGeneral Introduction; Patrice Canivez and Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Part 1. Roman Law and Logic -- Proculus on the Meanings of OR and the Types of Disjunction; Karlheinz Hülser -- Disjunctive Statements in Roman Legal Arguments; Markus Winkler -- Part 2. Leibniz, Law and Logic -- Presumptions and Conjectures in Leibniz’s Legal Theory; Matthias Armgardt -- Suspensive Condition & Dynamic Epistemic Logic; Sebastien Magnier -- The Rhetor’s Dilemma: Leibniz’s Approach to an Ancient Case; Bettine Jankowski -- Part 3. Current Interactions between Law and Logic -- On Hypothetical Judgements and Leibniz’s Notion of Conditional Right; Shahid Rahman -- Legal Fictions, Assumptions and Comparisons; Giuliano Bacigalupo -- Reasoning with Form & Content; Juliele Sievers and Sebastien Magnier -- Note on a Second Order Game in Legal Practice; Reinhard Z. Bengez -- Conflict of Norms and Conflict of Values in Law; Sandrine Chassagnard-Pinet -- The Service Contract (Contrat d´Entreprise); Juliette Sénéchal.
520 |aThis volume explores the relation between legal reasoning and logic from both a historical and a systematic perspective. The topics addressed include, among others, conditional legal acts, disjunctions in legal acts, presumptions and conjectures, conflicts of values, Jørgensen´s Dilemma, the Rhetor´s Dilemma, the theory of legal fictions, and the categorization of contracts. The unifying problematic of these contributions concerns the conditional structures and, more particularly, the relationship between legal theory and legal reasoning in the context of conditions. The contributions in this work constitute the first results of the ANR-DFG joint research project “JuriLog” (Jurisprudence and Logic), which aims at fostering the cooperation between legal scholars and philosophers. On the one hand, lawyers and legal scholars have an interest in emphasizing the logical character of legal reasoning. In this respect, the present enquiry examines the question of how logic, especially newer forms of dialogical logic, can be made fruitful as a significant area of philosophy for jurisprudence and legal practice. On the other hand, logicians find in legal reasoning a striving towards clear definitions and inference-procedures that is relevant to their discipline. In order to fully understand such reciprocal relationships, it is necessary to bridge the gap between law, logic and philosophy in contemporary academic research. The essays collected in this volume all work towards this common goal. The book is divided in three sections. In the first part, the strong relation betweenRoman Law and logic is explored with respect to the analysis of disjunctive statements in legal acts. The second part focuses on Leibniz´s legal theory. The third part, finally, is dedicated to current interactions between law and logic.
650 0|aLaw|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aLaw|xHistory.
650 0|aLogic.
650 0|aApplied linguistics.
650 0|aKnowledge, Sociology of.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Law.
650 24|aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
650 24|aLogic.
650 24|aApplied Linguistics.
650 24|aSociology of Knowledge and Discourse.
700 1 |aArmgardt, Matthias.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aCanivez, Patrice.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aChassagnard-Pinet, Sandrine.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319160207
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319160221
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319359250
830 0|aLogic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences,|x2214-9139 ;|v7
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16021-4
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
Materyaller
Depodan talep edilen materyal sadece kütüphane içerisinde kullanılmaktadır.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
