LEADER 04125nam a22005175i 4500
001 806606
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127002431
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1972 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401028530|9978-94-010-2853-0
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-010-2853-0|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aBD95-131
072 7|aHPJ|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI013000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQDTJ|2thema
082 04|a110|223
090 |aDK/7900
100 1 |aDoig, J.C.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aAquinas on Metaphysics|h[electronic resource] :|bA Historico-Doctrinal Study of the Commentary on the Metaphysics /|cby J.C. Doig.
250 |a1st ed. 1972.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1972.
300 |aXIV, 417 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aOne -- I. Literary and Chronologicale Aspects of the Commentary -- II. The Metaphysical Views of Avicenna, Averroes, and Albert -- III. The Prooemium to Aquinas’ Commentary -- Two -- IV. The Object of Metaphysics -- V. The Relation of Metaphysics to the Other Sciences -- VI. The Method of Metaphysics -- Three -- VII. The Basic Insight of Aquina’s Commentary -- Conclusion -- Conclusion -- Index of Topics -- Index of Texts.
520 |aThomas Aquinas' Commentary on the Metaphysics has long been con sidered by many as one of the most interesting, most rewarding of all his works. Yet strangely enough, there has been no extensive study of this work, at least none that has ever reached print. It is in the hope of partially filling this gap in medieval research that the present study of the metaphysical system of the Commentary was conceived. However, the discussion of the Commentary's metaphysics must simultaneously be an investigation into the reasons which motivated Aquinas in the composition of his work. Did he wish to expose only the theories of Aristotle, or did he simultaneously intend to present his own metaphysical views? Obviously, we must learn the answer to this before we can proceed to disentangle the metaphysical system, or systems, operative in Aquinas' Commentary. Up to the present day this problem, the nature of Aquinas' exposition has not been answered in a manner acceptable to all. Generally speak ing, three theories have been advanced. A first one would see the 1 Commentary as an objective exposition of Aristotle. A second opinion views Aquinas' exposition as an attempt to express his own personal 2 theories on metaphysics. And finally, the third view divides within the Commentary paragraphs containing Aquinas' personal thought ...
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aMetaphysics.
650 0|aScience|xPhilosophy.
650 14|aMetaphysics.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Science.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789024750450
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401028547
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2853-0
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
