LEADER 04034nam a22006255i 4500
001 806730
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127002707
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s2000 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401139359|9978-94-011-3935-9
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-011-3935-9|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aQ174-175.3
050 4|aB67
072 7|aPDA|2bicssc
072 7|aSCI075000|2bisacsh
072 7|aPDA|2thema
082 04|a501|223
090 |aDK/8024
245 10|aAfter Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend|h[electronic resource] :|bRecent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method /|cedited by R. Nola, H. Sankey.
250 |a1st ed. 2000.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2000.
300 |aXIX, 257 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aStudies in History and Philosophy of Science,|x2215-1958 ;|v15
505 0 |aA Selective Survey of Theories of Scientific Method -- How We Know About Electrons -- The Rationality of the Chemical Revolution -- Kuhn, Bayes and ‘Theory-Choice’: How Revolutionary is Kuhn’s Account of Theoretical Change? -- With Friends Like These…, or What is Inductivism and Why is it Off the Agenda? -- Is Epistemology Adequate to the Task of Rational Theory Evaluation? -- Naturalism Logicized -- Methodological Pluralism, Normative Naturalism and the Realist Aim of Science -- Hard Problems in the Philosophy of Science: Idealisation and Commensurability -- Notes on Contributors -- Index of Names.
520 |aSome think that issues to do with scientific method are last century's stale debate; Popper was an advocate of methodology, but Kuhn, Feyerabend, and others are alleged to have brought the debate about its status to an end. The papers in this volume show that issues in methodology are still very much alive. Some of the papers reinvestigate issues in the debate over methodology, while others set out new ways in which the debate has developed in the last decade. The book will be of interest to philosophers and scientists alike in the reassessment it provides of earlier debates about method and current directions of research.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aScience|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aKnowledge, Theory of.
650 0|aHistory.
650 0|aPhilosophy.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Science.
650 24|aEpistemology.
650 24|aHistory.
650 24|aPhilosophy.
700 1 |aNola, R.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aSankey, H.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780792360322
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402002465
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401139366
830 0|aStudies in History and Philosophy of Science,|x2215-1958 ;|v15
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3935-9
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)