Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [electronic resource] : Twenty Exploratory Studies / edited by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen.
Erişim Adresi
ISBN
9789400740419
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/8277
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 2012.
Yayın Bilgisi
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2012.
Fiziksel Niteleme
X, 346 p. online resource.
Dizi
Argumentation Library, 2215-1907 ; 22
İçindekiler Notu
Introduction: Some Highlights in Recent Theorizing; Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen -- Part I: Theoretical Perspectives -- 1. Rhetorical Argument; James F. Klumpp -- 2. Meta-Argumentation: Prolegomena to a Dutch Project; Maurice A. Finocchiaro -- 3. Wittgenstein’s Influence on Hamblin’s Concept of “Dialectical”; Ralph H. Johnson -- Part II: Views on Dissensus and Deep Disagreement -- 4. Can Argumentation Really Deal with Dissensus?; James B. Freeman -- 5. The Appeal for Transcendence: A Possible Response to Cases of Deep Disagreement; David Zarefsky -- 6. Cultural Diversity, Cognitive Breaks, and Deep Disagreement: Polemic Argument; Manfred Kraus -- Part III: Types of Argumentation -- 7. When Figurative Analogies Fail: Fallacious Uses of Arguments from Analogy; Manfred Kienpointner -- 8. Wellman and Govier on Weighing Considerations in Conductive Pro and Contra Arguments; Thomas Fischer -- 9. Evaluating Pragmatic Argumentation: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective; Constanza Ihnen Jory -- Part IV: Classical Themes Revisited -- 10. The Nature and Purpose of Dialectic: Aristotle and Contemporary Argumentation Theory; Marta Spranzi -- 11. The Ethos of Classical Rhetoric: from Epieikeia to Auctorias; Janja Žmavc -- 12. The Emotions’ Impact on Audience Judgments and Decision-Making in Aristotle’s Rhetoric; Andreas Welzel and Christopher W. Tindale -- 13. Argumentative Topoi for Refutation and Confirmation; Anders Eriksson -- Part V: Visual Argumentation -- 14. Image, Evidence, Argument; Ian J. Dove -- 15. Visual Tropes and Figures as Visual Argumentation; Jens E. Kjeldsen -- 16. Iconicity in Visual and Verbal Argumentation; Paul van den Hoven -- 17. Visual Argumentation: A Reappraisal; Georges Roque -- Part VI: Empirical Research -- 18. The Argumentative Structure of some Persuasive Appeal Variations; Daniel J. O’Keefe -- 19. The Costs and Benefits of Arguing: Predicting the Decision Whether to Engage or Not; Dale Hample, Fabio Paglieri and Ling Na -- 20. The ExtendedPragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Interpreted; Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels -- List of Contributors.
Özet, vb.
Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory brings together twenty exploratory studies on important subjects of research in contemporary argumentation theory. The essays are based on papers that were presented at the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA) in Amsterdam in June 2010. They give an impression of the nature and the variety of the kind of research that has recently been carried out in the study of argumentation. The volume starts with three essays that provide stimulating theoretical perspectives on argumentation. Subsequently, some views are explained on the intriguing topics of ‘dissensus’ and ‘deep disagreement’. After a discussion of three different approaches to the treatment of types of argumentation some classical themes from antique argumentation theory are revisited. The new research area of visual argumentation is explored in the next part. The volume concludes with three reports of experimental studies concerning argumentative discourse.
Konu
Language and languages __ Philosophy.
Literacy.
History, Ancient.
Logic.
Linguistics.
Philosophy of Language.
Literacy.
Classical Studies.
Logic.
Linguistics.
Literacy.
History, Ancient.
Logic.
Linguistics.
Philosophy of Language.
Literacy.
Classical Studies.
Logic.
Linguistics.
Diğer Yazarlar
Kurum Adı
Eseri Alıntıla
Referansları kullanmadan önce gözden geçirmeniz ve varsa gerekli düzeltmeleri yapmanız önerilir.
Dijital Kaynak
MARC Görünümü
LEADER 05201nam a22005775i 4500
001 806983
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127003216
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 120504s2012 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789400740419|9978-94-007-4041-9
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aP101-120
072 7|aCFA|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI038000|2bisacsh
072 7|aCFA|2thema
082 04|a149.94|223
090 |aDK/8277
245 10|aTopical Themes in Argumentation Theory|h[electronic resource] :|bTwenty Exploratory Studies /|cedited by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen.
250 |a1st ed. 2012.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2012.
300 |aX, 346 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aArgumentation Library,|x2215-1907 ;|v22
505 0 |aIntroduction: Some Highlights in Recent Theorizing; Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen -- Part I: Theoretical Perspectives -- 1. Rhetorical Argument; James F. Klumpp -- 2. Meta-Argumentation: Prolegomena to a Dutch Project; Maurice A. Finocchiaro -- 3. Wittgenstein’s Influence on Hamblin’s Concept of “Dialectical”; Ralph H. Johnson -- Part II: Views on Dissensus and Deep Disagreement -- 4. Can Argumentation Really Deal with Dissensus?; James B. Freeman -- 5. The Appeal for Transcendence: A Possible Response to Cases of Deep Disagreement; David Zarefsky -- 6. Cultural Diversity, Cognitive Breaks, and Deep Disagreement: Polemic Argument; Manfred Kraus -- Part III: Types of Argumentation -- 7. When Figurative Analogies Fail: Fallacious Uses of Arguments from Analogy; Manfred Kienpointner -- 8. Wellman and Govier on Weighing Considerations in Conductive Pro and Contra Arguments; Thomas Fischer -- 9. Evaluating Pragmatic Argumentation: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective; Constanza Ihnen Jory -- Part IV: Classical Themes Revisited -- 10. The Nature and Purpose of Dialectic: Aristotle and Contemporary Argumentation Theory; Marta Spranzi -- 11. The Ethos of Classical Rhetoric: from Epieikeia to Auctorias; Janja Žmavc -- 12. The Emotions’ Impact on Audience Judgments and Decision-Making in Aristotle’s Rhetoric; Andreas Welzel and Christopher W. Tindale -- 13. Argumentative Topoi for Refutation and Confirmation; Anders Eriksson -- Part V: Visual Argumentation -- 14. Image, Evidence, Argument; Ian J. Dove -- 15. Visual Tropes and Figures as Visual Argumentation; Jens E. Kjeldsen -- 16. Iconicity in Visual and Verbal Argumentation; Paul van den Hoven -- 17. Visual Argumentation: A Reappraisal; Georges Roque -- Part VI: Empirical Research -- 18. The Argumentative Structure of some Persuasive Appeal Variations; Daniel J. O’Keefe -- 19. The Costs and Benefits of Arguing: Predicting the Decision Whether to Engage or Not; Dale Hample, Fabio Paglieri and Ling Na -- 20. The ExtendedPragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Interpreted; Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels -- List of Contributors.
520 |aTopical Themes in Argumentation Theory brings together twenty exploratory studies on important subjects of research in contemporary argumentation theory. The essays are based on papers that were presented at the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA) in Amsterdam in June 2010. They give an impression of the nature and the variety of the kind of research that has recently been carried out in the study of argumentation. The volume starts with three essays that provide stimulating theoretical perspectives on argumentation. Subsequently, some views are explained on the intriguing topics of ‘dissensus’ and ‘deep disagreement’. After a discussion of three different approaches to the treatment of types of argumentation some classical themes from antique argumentation theory are revisited. The new research area of visual argumentation is explored in the next part. The volume concludes with three reports of experimental studies concerning argumentative discourse.
650 0|aLanguage and languages|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aLiteracy.
650 0|aHistory, Ancient.
650 0|aLogic.
650 0|aLinguistics.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Language.
650 24|aLiteracy.
650 24|aClassical Studies.
650 24|aLogic.
650 24|aLinguistics.
700 1 |avan Eemeren, Frans H.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aGarssen, Bart.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400740402
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400740426
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401784108
830 0|aArgumentation Library,|x2215-1907 ;|v22
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
001 806983
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127003216
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 120504s2012 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789400740419|9978-94-007-4041-9
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aP101-120
072 7|aCFA|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI038000|2bisacsh
072 7|aCFA|2thema
082 04|a149.94|223
090 |aDK/8277
245 10|aTopical Themes in Argumentation Theory|h[electronic resource] :|bTwenty Exploratory Studies /|cedited by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen.
250 |a1st ed. 2012.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2012.
300 |aX, 346 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aArgumentation Library,|x2215-1907 ;|v22
505 0 |aIntroduction: Some Highlights in Recent Theorizing; Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen -- Part I: Theoretical Perspectives -- 1. Rhetorical Argument; James F. Klumpp -- 2. Meta-Argumentation: Prolegomena to a Dutch Project; Maurice A. Finocchiaro -- 3. Wittgenstein’s Influence on Hamblin’s Concept of “Dialectical”; Ralph H. Johnson -- Part II: Views on Dissensus and Deep Disagreement -- 4. Can Argumentation Really Deal with Dissensus?; James B. Freeman -- 5. The Appeal for Transcendence: A Possible Response to Cases of Deep Disagreement; David Zarefsky -- 6. Cultural Diversity, Cognitive Breaks, and Deep Disagreement: Polemic Argument; Manfred Kraus -- Part III: Types of Argumentation -- 7. When Figurative Analogies Fail: Fallacious Uses of Arguments from Analogy; Manfred Kienpointner -- 8. Wellman and Govier on Weighing Considerations in Conductive Pro and Contra Arguments; Thomas Fischer -- 9. Evaluating Pragmatic Argumentation: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective; Constanza Ihnen Jory -- Part IV: Classical Themes Revisited -- 10. The Nature and Purpose of Dialectic: Aristotle and Contemporary Argumentation Theory; Marta Spranzi -- 11. The Ethos of Classical Rhetoric: from Epieikeia to Auctorias; Janja Žmavc -- 12. The Emotions’ Impact on Audience Judgments and Decision-Making in Aristotle’s Rhetoric; Andreas Welzel and Christopher W. Tindale -- 13. Argumentative Topoi for Refutation and Confirmation; Anders Eriksson -- Part V: Visual Argumentation -- 14. Image, Evidence, Argument; Ian J. Dove -- 15. Visual Tropes and Figures as Visual Argumentation; Jens E. Kjeldsen -- 16. Iconicity in Visual and Verbal Argumentation; Paul van den Hoven -- 17. Visual Argumentation: A Reappraisal; Georges Roque -- Part VI: Empirical Research -- 18. The Argumentative Structure of some Persuasive Appeal Variations; Daniel J. O’Keefe -- 19. The Costs and Benefits of Arguing: Predicting the Decision Whether to Engage or Not; Dale Hample, Fabio Paglieri and Ling Na -- 20. The ExtendedPragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Interpreted; Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels -- List of Contributors.
520 |aTopical Themes in Argumentation Theory brings together twenty exploratory studies on important subjects of research in contemporary argumentation theory. The essays are based on papers that were presented at the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA) in Amsterdam in June 2010. They give an impression of the nature and the variety of the kind of research that has recently been carried out in the study of argumentation. The volume starts with three essays that provide stimulating theoretical perspectives on argumentation. Subsequently, some views are explained on the intriguing topics of ‘dissensus’ and ‘deep disagreement’. After a discussion of three different approaches to the treatment of types of argumentation some classical themes from antique argumentation theory are revisited. The new research area of visual argumentation is explored in the next part. The volume concludes with three reports of experimental studies concerning argumentative discourse.
650 0|aLanguage and languages|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aLiteracy.
650 0|aHistory, Ancient.
650 0|aLogic.
650 0|aLinguistics.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Language.
650 24|aLiteracy.
650 24|aClassical Studies.
650 24|aLogic.
650 24|aLinguistics.
700 1 |avan Eemeren, Frans H.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aGarssen, Bart.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400740402
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400740426
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401784108
830 0|aArgumentation Library,|x2215-1907 ;|v22
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
Materyaller
Depodan talep edilen materyal sadece kütüphane içerisinde kullanılmaktadır.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
