The Archaeology of Gender [electronic resource] : Separating the Spheres in Urban America / by Diana diZerga Wall.

Erişim Adresi
Link
ISBN
9781489912107
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/8389
Yazar
Wall, Diana diZerga.
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 1994.
Yayın Bilgisi
New York, NY : Springer US : Imprint: Springer, 1994.
Fiziksel Niteleme
XX, 242 p. online resource.
Dizi
Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology, 2730-6984
İçindekiler Notu
1 • Introduction -- 2 • The Separation of the Home and the Workplace -- 3 • The Changing Social Landscape of the City -- Plates • The Changing Face of the City -- 4 • Changing Household Composition -- 5 • The Ritualization of Family Meals I -- 6 • The Ritualization of Family Meals II -- 7 • Conclusion -- Appendix A • The Documentary Data -- The Nature of the Samples -- Organizing the Data -- The Division of the Samples into “Classes” -- Notes -- Appendix B • The Data on the Separation of the Home and the Workplace -- Note -- Appendix C • The Geographical Data -- Appendix D • The Data on Household Composition -- Appendix E • The Archaeological Data -- Choosing the Archaeological Assemblages -- Dating the Archaeological Assemblages -- Ascribing the Archaeological Assemblages to Particular Households -- Counting the Vessels -- The Archaeological Data -- Sampling Problems -- Notes -- References -- Tables and Figures.
Özet, vb.
Historical archaeologists often become so involved in their potsherd patterns they seldom have time or energy left to address the broader processes responsi­ ble for the material culture patterns they recognize. Some ofus haveurged our colleagues to use the historical record as a springboard from which to launch hypotheses with which to better understand the behavioral and cultural pro­ cesses responsible for the archaeological record. Toooften, this urging has re­ sulted in reports designed like a sandwich, having a slice of "historical back­ ground," followed by a totally different "archaeological record," and closed with a weevil-ridden slice of "interpretation" of questionable nutritive value for understanding the past. The reader is often left to wonder what the archae­ ological meat had to do with either slice of bread, since the connection be­ tween the documented history and the material culture is left to the reader's imagination, and the connection between the interpretation and the other disparate parts is tenuous at best. The plethora of stale archaeological sandwiches in the literature has re­ sulted at the methodological level from a too-narrow focus on the specific history and archaeology ofa site and the individuals involvedon it, rather than a focus on the explanation of broader processes of culture to which the actors and events at the site-specific level responded.
Konu
Archaeology.
Archaeology.
Kurum Adı
SpringerLink (Online service)
İşlemler