LEADER 03978nam a22005415i 4500
001 807154
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127003540
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1986 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789400945302|9978-94-009-4530-2
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-009-4530-2|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aP291-298
072 7|aCFK|2bicssc
072 7|aLAN009060|2bisacsh
072 7|aCFK|2thema
082 04|a415|223
090 |aDK/8447
100 1 |aDavies, William D.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aChoctaw Verb Agreement and Universal Grammar|h[electronic resource] /|cby William D. Davies.
250 |a1st ed. 1986.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1986.
300 |aXII, 202 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aStudies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,|x2215-0358 ;|v2
505 0 |a1: Introduction -- 1. Choctaw verb agreement -- 2. Other problems in Choctaw -- 3. Results of the study -- 2: Two Classes of Intransitive Predicates -- 1. Properties of Choctaw subjects -- 2. The two classes of intransitives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis -- 3. Final 1hood of unaccusative subjects -- 4. The role of the Unaccusative Hypothesis -- 5. Summary -- 3: Dative Beneficiaries and Dative Possessors -- 1. Dative beneficiaries -- 2. Dative possessors -- 3. Summary -- 4: The Double Accusative Construction -- 1. The structure of the subject -- 2. The Antipassive structure -- 3. The configuration of the initial 2 -- 4. Possessor Ascension and the Antipassive structure -- 5. Conclusions -- 5: Dative Subjects -- 1. Characterization of the dative subject -- 2. Characterizing the object -- 3. The failure of an alternative analysis -- 4. Conclusion -- 6: Dative Direct Objects -- 1. The dative direct object -- 2. Accusative subject/dative direct object clauses -- 3. Inversion and 2–3 Retreat -- 4. Demotions in Universal Grammar -- 7: A Proposal for Verb Agreement -- 1. An account of Choctaw verb agreement -- 2. Disjunctive application of agreement rules -- 3. Summary -- Appendix: Switch-reference and disjunctive rule application -- 8: The Interaction of Agreement and Case -- 1. Transparency of agreement and case -- 2. Agreement as a lexical property -- 3. A proposal for agreement and case -- 4. Conclusion -- References.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aGrammar, Comparative and general|xSyntax.
650 0|aIndians|xLanguages.
650 14|aSyntax.
650 24|aAmeri-Indian Languages.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789027720658
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789027721426
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400945319
830 0|aStudies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,|x2215-0358 ;|v2
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4530-2
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXS
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aSocial Sciences (R0) (SpringerNature-43726)