LEADER 04423nam a22005895i 4500
001 807271
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127003757
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s2003 xxu| s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9781461502906|9978-1-4615-0290-6
024 7 |a10.1007/978-1-4615-0290-6|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aJA1-92
072 7|aJPA|2bicssc
072 7|aPOL000000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJPA|2thema
082 04|a320|223
090 |aDK/8564
245 10|aEconomic Assessment of Election Programmes|h[electronic resource] :|bDoes it make sense? /|cedited by Johan J. Graafland, Arie P. Ros.
250 |a1st ed. 2003.
264 1|aNew York, NY :|bSpringer US :|bImprint: Springer,|c2003.
300 |aXII, 155 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aI Introduction -- 1. A Day of Reckoning for Politicians — or Economists? -- 2. Charting Choices 2003–2006 -- 3. Economic Analysis of Election Programmes: What, How, and Why? -- II Economic Methodological Aspects -- 4. An Economic Perspective -- 5. Macro Models as Workhorses -- 6. Balancing Information and Uncertainty -- III Political Aspects -- 7. Calculated Choices: Who Profits? -- 8. A Rationale for Assessments of Election Programmes -- 9. Food for Politicians, Not for Voters -- 10. The Democratic Quality of Elections -- 11. Agonistic Democracy and the Civilising Virtues of Public Debate -- IV Assessment of Election Programmes: Conclusions for the Future -- 12. The Views of the Political Parties -- 13. Summary and Conclusions.
520 |aIn the Netherlands, the election programmes of the political parties are assessed for their economic impact by an independent economic bureau. The result of this analysis is published just before the elections take place. In this way, the voter will be protected against political parties that try to win the elections by making popular but unfounded financial promises. Economic Assessment of Election Programmes contains contributions of several distinguished economists and philosophers who consider the gains of this procedure to society. Does the analysis by the Netherlands' Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB) raise the democratic quality of the elections? Can we really be confident in the tools of economics? The last section of this volume states the opinion of representatives of the political parties. This part also clarifies why political parties voluntarily participate in this process and how they perceive the role division between the political party and CPB.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aPolitical science.
650 0|aMacroeconomics.
650 0|aMicroeconomics.
650 0|aEconomics|xHistory.
650 14|aPolitical Science.
650 24|aMacroeconomics and Monetary Economics.
650 24|aMicroeconomics.
650 24|aHistory of Economic Thought and Methodology.
700 1 |aGraafland, Johan J.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aRos, Arie P.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402073908
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781461502913
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781461350064
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0290-6
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPI
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPolitical Science and International Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43724)