Rescuing Reason [electronic resource] : A Critique of Anti-Rationalist Views of Science and Knowledge / by R. Nola.
Erişim Adresi
ISBN
9789401002899
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/8652
Yazar
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 2003.
Yayın Bilgisi
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2003.
Fiziksel Niteleme
XI, 559 p. online resource.
Dizi
Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, 2214-7942 ; 230
İçindekiler Notu
I: Knowledge, Science And The Epistemological Enterprise: Synopsis Of Part I -- 1: The Critical Tradition And Some Of Its Discontents -- 2: The Problem Of Knowledge -- 3: Naturalism And Norms Of Reason And Method -- II: THE POVERTY OF THE SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE: SYNOPSIS OF PART II -- 4: Some German Connections: Marx And Mannheim -- 5: The Edinburgh Connection I: The Strong Programme And The Social Causes Of Scientific Belief -- 6: The Edinburgh Connection Ii: Strong And Wrong -- 7: The Wittgenstein Connection: The Social And The Rational -- III: The French Connection: Foucault: Synopsis Of Part Iii -- 8: An Archaeological Dig Through Foucault’S Texts -- 9: Genealogy, Power And Knowledge -- IV: The German Connection: Nietzsche: Synopsis Of Part IV -- 10: Nietzsche’S Genealogy of Belief And Morality -- 11: Epilogue -- References -- Name Index.
Özet, vb.
Do knowledge and science arise from the application of canons of rationality and scientific method? Or is all our scientific knowledge caused by socio-political factors, or by our interests in the socio-political - the view of sociologists of "knowledge"? Or does it result from interplay of relations of power - the view of Michel Foucault? Or does our knowledge arise from "the will to power" - the view of Nietzsche? This volume sets out to critically examine the theses of those who would debunk the idea of rational explanation. The book is wide-ranging. The theories of method of Quine, Kuhn, Feyerabend (amongst others) are discussed and related to the views of Marx, Foucault, Wittgenstein and Nietzsche as well as sociologists of science such as Mannheim and Bloor. The author provides a wide interpretative framework which links the doctrines espoused by many of these authors; it is argued that they inherit many of the difficulties in the Strong Programme in the sociology of "knowledge", and that they fail to reconcile the normativity of knowledge with their naturalism. It is argued that neither relativists, sceptics, nihilists, sociologists of "knowledge" nor the postmodernists successfully debunk the claims of rational explanation, far from it: these theorists presuppose much of the theory of methodology they deny.
Konu
Science __ Philosophy.
Knowledge, Theory of.
Philosophy __ History.
Philosophy of Science.
Epistemology.
History of Philosophy.
Knowledge, Theory of.
Philosophy __ History.
Philosophy of Science.
Epistemology.
History of Philosophy.
Kurum Adı
Eseri Alıntıla
Referansları kullanmadan önce gözden geçirmeniz ve varsa gerekli düzeltmeleri yapmanız önerilir.
Dijital Kaynak
MARC Görünümü
LEADER 04883nam a22005895i 4500
001 807359
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127003947
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s2003 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401002899|9978-94-010-0289-9
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-010-0289-9|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aQ174-175.3
050 4|aB67
072 7|aPDA|2bicssc
072 7|aSCI075000|2bisacsh
072 7|aPDA|2thema
082 04|a501|223
090 |aDK/8652
100 1 |aNola, R.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aRescuing Reason|h[electronic resource] :|bA Critique of Anti-Rationalist Views of Science and Knowledge /|cby R. Nola.
250 |a1st ed. 2003.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2003.
300 |aXI, 559 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aBoston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,|x2214-7942 ;|v230
505 0 |aI: Knowledge, Science And The Epistemological Enterprise: Synopsis Of Part I -- 1: The Critical Tradition And Some Of Its Discontents -- 2: The Problem Of Knowledge -- 3: Naturalism And Norms Of Reason And Method -- II: THE POVERTY OF THE SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE: SYNOPSIS OF PART II -- 4: Some German Connections: Marx And Mannheim -- 5: The Edinburgh Connection I: The Strong Programme And The Social Causes Of Scientific Belief -- 6: The Edinburgh Connection Ii: Strong And Wrong -- 7: The Wittgenstein Connection: The Social And The Rational -- III: The French Connection: Foucault: Synopsis Of Part Iii -- 8: An Archaeological Dig Through Foucault’S Texts -- 9: Genealogy, Power And Knowledge -- IV: The German Connection: Nietzsche: Synopsis Of Part IV -- 10: Nietzsche’S Genealogy of Belief And Morality -- 11: Epilogue -- References -- Name Index.
520 |aDo knowledge and science arise from the application of canons of rationality and scientific method? Or is all our scientific knowledge caused by socio-political factors, or by our interests in the socio-political - the view of sociologists of "knowledge"? Or does it result from interplay of relations of power - the view of Michel Foucault? Or does our knowledge arise from "the will to power" - the view of Nietzsche? This volume sets out to critically examine the theses of those who would debunk the idea of rational explanation. The book is wide-ranging. The theories of method of Quine, Kuhn, Feyerabend (amongst others) are discussed and related to the views of Marx, Foucault, Wittgenstein and Nietzsche as well as sociologists of science such as Mannheim and Bloor. The author provides a wide interpretative framework which links the doctrines espoused by many of these authors; it is argued that they inherit many of the difficulties in the Strong Programme in the sociology of "knowledge", and that they fail to reconcile the normativity of knowledge with their naturalism. It is argued that neither relativists, sceptics, nihilists, sociologists of "knowledge" nor the postmodernists successfully debunk the claims of rational explanation, far from it: these theorists presuppose much of the theory of methodology they deny.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aScience|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aKnowledge, Theory of.
650 0|aPhilosophy|xHistory.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Science.
650 24|aEpistemology.
650 24|aHistory of Philosophy.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402010422
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402010439
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401002905
830 0|aBoston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,|x2214-7942 ;|v230
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0289-9
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
001 807359
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127003947
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s2003 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401002899|9978-94-010-0289-9
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-010-0289-9|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aQ174-175.3
050 4|aB67
072 7|aPDA|2bicssc
072 7|aSCI075000|2bisacsh
072 7|aPDA|2thema
082 04|a501|223
090 |aDK/8652
100 1 |aNola, R.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aRescuing Reason|h[electronic resource] :|bA Critique of Anti-Rationalist Views of Science and Knowledge /|cby R. Nola.
250 |a1st ed. 2003.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2003.
300 |aXI, 559 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aBoston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,|x2214-7942 ;|v230
505 0 |aI: Knowledge, Science And The Epistemological Enterprise: Synopsis Of Part I -- 1: The Critical Tradition And Some Of Its Discontents -- 2: The Problem Of Knowledge -- 3: Naturalism And Norms Of Reason And Method -- II: THE POVERTY OF THE SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE: SYNOPSIS OF PART II -- 4: Some German Connections: Marx And Mannheim -- 5: The Edinburgh Connection I: The Strong Programme And The Social Causes Of Scientific Belief -- 6: The Edinburgh Connection Ii: Strong And Wrong -- 7: The Wittgenstein Connection: The Social And The Rational -- III: The French Connection: Foucault: Synopsis Of Part Iii -- 8: An Archaeological Dig Through Foucault’S Texts -- 9: Genealogy, Power And Knowledge -- IV: The German Connection: Nietzsche: Synopsis Of Part IV -- 10: Nietzsche’S Genealogy of Belief And Morality -- 11: Epilogue -- References -- Name Index.
520 |aDo knowledge and science arise from the application of canons of rationality and scientific method? Or is all our scientific knowledge caused by socio-political factors, or by our interests in the socio-political - the view of sociologists of "knowledge"? Or does it result from interplay of relations of power - the view of Michel Foucault? Or does our knowledge arise from "the will to power" - the view of Nietzsche? This volume sets out to critically examine the theses of those who would debunk the idea of rational explanation. The book is wide-ranging. The theories of method of Quine, Kuhn, Feyerabend (amongst others) are discussed and related to the views of Marx, Foucault, Wittgenstein and Nietzsche as well as sociologists of science such as Mannheim and Bloor. The author provides a wide interpretative framework which links the doctrines espoused by many of these authors; it is argued that they inherit many of the difficulties in the Strong Programme in the sociology of "knowledge", and that they fail to reconcile the normativity of knowledge with their naturalism. It is argued that neither relativists, sceptics, nihilists, sociologists of "knowledge" nor the postmodernists successfully debunk the claims of rational explanation, far from it: these theorists presuppose much of the theory of methodology they deny.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aScience|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aKnowledge, Theory of.
650 0|aPhilosophy|xHistory.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Science.
650 24|aEpistemology.
650 24|aHistory of Philosophy.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402010422
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402010439
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401002905
830 0|aBoston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,|x2214-7942 ;|v230
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0289-9
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
Materyaller
Depodan talep edilen materyal sadece kütüphane içerisinde kullanılmaktadır.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
