LEADER 03749nam a22005055i 4500
001 807579
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127004404
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1972 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401027892|9978-94-010-2789-2
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-010-2789-2|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aGN
072 7|aJHM|2bicssc
072 7|aSOC002000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJHM|2thema
082 04|a301|223
090 |aDK/8872
100 1 |aClark, M.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aPerplexity and Knowledge|h[electronic resource] :|bAn Inquiry into the Structures of Questioning /|cby M. Clark.
250 |a1st ed. 1972.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1972.
300 |aVIII, 246 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aI The Viewpoint of Inquiry -- I: Alternative Accounts -- II: Duality and Self-Correction -- II Historical Notes on the Form of Inquiry -- III: Scepticism and Negative Proof -- IV: Plato and the Forms of Geometry -- V: Aristotle and the Forms of Life -- VI: Descartes and Reflection -- VII: Empiricists and Experience -- VIII: Kant and the Uses of Reason -- III Outlines for a Critique of Questioning -- IX: Perplexity and Progress -- X: Sense -- XI: Intellect -- XII: Practical Reason.
520 |aIn making his distinction between revisionary and descriptive metaphysics, P.F. Strawson wrote that the former has some value provided that its "partial vision" is at the service of the latter, "which needs no justification at all beyond that of inquiry in general." (Individuals, p. 9) Perhaps we feel no need to ask what justification there is for inquiry in general. But if we do recognize any such need, then we discover that inquiry is self-justifying. The more I put it into question, the more I bring the theme of my inquiry to light in my performance of inquiring. Questioning is the business of philosophers. They are now content to leave the search for detailed information to experts in the various disciplines that have won their independence from philosophy. The questioning a philosopher conducts is of the 'second-order'. He asks about the status of various sorts of questions, the types of knowledge they yield and of con fusion into which they lead.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aAnthropology.
650 14|aAnthropology.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789024712892
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401027908
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401027915
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2789-2
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXS
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aSocial Sciences (R0) (SpringerNature-43726)