Governing Future Technologies [electronic resource] : Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime / edited by Mario Kaiser, Monika Kurath, Sabine Maasen, Christoph Rehmann-Sutter.
Erişim Adresi
ISBN
9789048128341
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/8902
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 2010.
Yayın Bilgisi
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2010.
Fiziksel Niteleme
XXIII, 314 p. online resource.
Dizi
Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 2215-1796 ; 27
İçindekiler Notu
Going ‘Nano’: Opportunities and Risks -- Reinventing a Laboratory: Nanotechnology as a Resource for Organizational Change -- Negotiating Nano: From Assessing Risks to Disciplinary Transformations -- “Nanoscience is 100 Years Old.” The Defensive Appropriation of the Nanotechnology Discourse within the Disciplinary Boundaries of Crystallography -- Making Sense: Visions, Images, and Video Games -- From Nano-Convergence to NBIC-Convergence: “The Best Way to Predict the Future is to Create it” -- Deliberating Visions: The Case of Human Enhancement in the Discourse on Nanotechnology and Convergence -- Visual Dynamics: The Defuturization of the Popular “Nano-Discourse” as an Effect of Increasing Economization -- Digital Matters: Video Games and the Cultural Transcoding of Nanotechnology -- Assessing ‘Nano’: Repercussions on Research -- Emerging De Facto Agendas Surrounding Nanotechnology: Two Cases Full of Contingencies, Lock-outs, and Lock-ins -- The Risk Debate on Nanoparticles: Contribution to a Normalisation of the Science/Society Relationship? -- Futures Assessed: How Technology Assessment, Ethics and Think Tanks Make Sense of an Unknown Future -- Assessing Dialogue: Governing ‘Nano’ by ELSI -- Why Enrol Citizens in the Governance of Nanotechnology? -- Toward Anticipatory Governance: The Experience with Nanotechnology -- Which Ethics for (of) the Nanotechnologies? -- Deconstructing the Assessment Regime -- Lure of the “Yes”: The Seductive Power of Technoscience -- The Time of Science: Deliberation and the “New Governance” of Nanotechnology -- Converging Technologies – Diverging Reflexivities? Intellectual Work in Knowledge-Risk-Media-Audit Societies.
Özet, vb.
Nanotechnology has been the subject of extensive ‘assessment hype,’ unlike any previous field of research and development. A multiplicity of stakeholders have started to analyze the implications of nanotechnology: Technology assessment institutions around the world, non-governmental organizations, think tanks, re-insurance companies, and academics from science and technology studies and applied ethics have turned their attention to this growing field’s implications. In the course of these assessment efforts, a social phenomenon has emerged – a phenomenon the editors define as assessment regime. Despite the variety of organizations, methods, and actors involved in the evaluation and regulation of emerging nanotechnologies, the assessment activities comply with an overarching scientific and political imperative: Innovations are only welcome if they are assessed against the criteria of safety, sustainability, desirability, and acceptability. So far, such deliberations and reflections have played only a subordinate role. This book argues that with the rise of the nanotechnology assessment regime, however, things have changed dramatically: Situated at the crossroads of democratizing science and technology, good governance, and the quest for sustainable innovations, the assessment regime has become constitutive for technological development. The contributions in this book explore and critically analyse nanotechnology’s assessment regime: To what extent is it constitutive for technology in general, for nanotechnology in particular? What social conditions render the regime a phenomenon sui generis? And what are its implications for science and society?
Konu
Science __ History.
Science __ Philosophy.
Sociology.
Ethics.
History of Science.
Philosophy of Science.
Sociology.
Moral Philosophy and Applied Ethics.
Science __ Philosophy.
Sociology.
Ethics.
History of Science.
Philosophy of Science.
Sociology.
Moral Philosophy and Applied Ethics.
Kurum Adı
Eseri Alıntıla
Referansları kullanmadan önce gözden geçirmeniz ve varsa gerekli düzeltmeleri yapmanız önerilir.
Dijital Kaynak
MARC Görünümü
LEADER 05621nam a22005775i 4500
001 807609
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127004441
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2010 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789048128341|9978-90-481-2834-1
024 7 |a10.1007/978-90-481-2834-1|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aQ124.6-127.2
072 7|aPDX|2bicssc
072 7|aSCI034000|2bisacsh
072 7|aPDX|2thema
082 04|a509|223
090 |aDK/8902
245 10|aGoverning Future Technologies|h[electronic resource] :|bNanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime /|cedited by Mario Kaiser, Monika Kurath, Sabine Maasen, Christoph Rehmann-Sutter.
250 |a1st ed. 2010.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2010.
300 |aXXIII, 314 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aSociology of the Sciences Yearbook,|x2215-1796 ;|v27
505 0 |aGoing ‘Nano’: Opportunities and Risks -- Reinventing a Laboratory: Nanotechnology as a Resource for Organizational Change -- Negotiating Nano: From Assessing Risks to Disciplinary Transformations -- “Nanoscience is 100 Years Old.” The Defensive Appropriation of the Nanotechnology Discourse within the Disciplinary Boundaries of Crystallography -- Making Sense: Visions, Images, and Video Games -- From Nano-Convergence to NBIC-Convergence: “The Best Way to Predict the Future is to Create it” -- Deliberating Visions: The Case of Human Enhancement in the Discourse on Nanotechnology and Convergence -- Visual Dynamics: The Defuturization of the Popular “Nano-Discourse” as an Effect of Increasing Economization -- Digital Matters: Video Games and the Cultural Transcoding of Nanotechnology -- Assessing ‘Nano’: Repercussions on Research -- Emerging De Facto Agendas Surrounding Nanotechnology: Two Cases Full of Contingencies, Lock-outs, and Lock-ins -- The Risk Debate on Nanoparticles: Contribution to a Normalisation of the Science/Society Relationship? -- Futures Assessed: How Technology Assessment, Ethics and Think Tanks Make Sense of an Unknown Future -- Assessing Dialogue: Governing ‘Nano’ by ELSI -- Why Enrol Citizens in the Governance of Nanotechnology? -- Toward Anticipatory Governance: The Experience with Nanotechnology -- Which Ethics for (of) the Nanotechnologies? -- Deconstructing the Assessment Regime -- Lure of the “Yes”: The Seductive Power of Technoscience -- The Time of Science: Deliberation and the “New Governance” of Nanotechnology -- Converging Technologies – Diverging Reflexivities? Intellectual Work in Knowledge-Risk-Media-Audit Societies.
520 |aNanotechnology has been the subject of extensive ‘assessment hype,’ unlike any previous field of research and development. A multiplicity of stakeholders have started to analyze the implications of nanotechnology: Technology assessment institutions around the world, non-governmental organizations, think tanks, re-insurance companies, and academics from science and technology studies and applied ethics have turned their attention to this growing field’s implications. In the course of these assessment efforts, a social phenomenon has emerged – a phenomenon the editors define as assessment regime. Despite the variety of organizations, methods, and actors involved in the evaluation and regulation of emerging nanotechnologies, the assessment activities comply with an overarching scientific and political imperative: Innovations are only welcome if they are assessed against the criteria of safety, sustainability, desirability, and acceptability. So far, such deliberations and reflections have played only a subordinate role. This book argues that with the rise of the nanotechnology assessment regime, however, things have changed dramatically: Situated at the crossroads of democratizing science and technology, good governance, and the quest for sustainable innovations, the assessment regime has become constitutive for technological development. The contributions in this book explore and critically analyse nanotechnology’s assessment regime: To what extent is it constitutive for technology in general, for nanotechnology in particular? What social conditions render the regime a phenomenon sui generis? And what are its implications for science and society?
650 0|aScience|xHistory.
650 0|aScience|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aSociology.
650 0|aEthics.
650 14|aHistory of Science.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Science.
650 24|aSociology.
650 24|aMoral Philosophy and Applied Ethics.
700 1 |aKaiser, Mario.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aKurath, Monika.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aMaasen, Sabine.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aRehmann-Sutter, Christoph.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048128334
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048128358
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400730779
830 0|aSociology of the Sciences Yearbook,|x2215-1796 ;|v27
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2834-1
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXH
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aHistory (R0) (SpringerNature-43722)
001 807609
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127004441
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2010 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789048128341|9978-90-481-2834-1
024 7 |a10.1007/978-90-481-2834-1|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aQ124.6-127.2
072 7|aPDX|2bicssc
072 7|aSCI034000|2bisacsh
072 7|aPDX|2thema
082 04|a509|223
090 |aDK/8902
245 10|aGoverning Future Technologies|h[electronic resource] :|bNanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime /|cedited by Mario Kaiser, Monika Kurath, Sabine Maasen, Christoph Rehmann-Sutter.
250 |a1st ed. 2010.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2010.
300 |aXXIII, 314 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aSociology of the Sciences Yearbook,|x2215-1796 ;|v27
505 0 |aGoing ‘Nano’: Opportunities and Risks -- Reinventing a Laboratory: Nanotechnology as a Resource for Organizational Change -- Negotiating Nano: From Assessing Risks to Disciplinary Transformations -- “Nanoscience is 100 Years Old.” The Defensive Appropriation of the Nanotechnology Discourse within the Disciplinary Boundaries of Crystallography -- Making Sense: Visions, Images, and Video Games -- From Nano-Convergence to NBIC-Convergence: “The Best Way to Predict the Future is to Create it” -- Deliberating Visions: The Case of Human Enhancement in the Discourse on Nanotechnology and Convergence -- Visual Dynamics: The Defuturization of the Popular “Nano-Discourse” as an Effect of Increasing Economization -- Digital Matters: Video Games and the Cultural Transcoding of Nanotechnology -- Assessing ‘Nano’: Repercussions on Research -- Emerging De Facto Agendas Surrounding Nanotechnology: Two Cases Full of Contingencies, Lock-outs, and Lock-ins -- The Risk Debate on Nanoparticles: Contribution to a Normalisation of the Science/Society Relationship? -- Futures Assessed: How Technology Assessment, Ethics and Think Tanks Make Sense of an Unknown Future -- Assessing Dialogue: Governing ‘Nano’ by ELSI -- Why Enrol Citizens in the Governance of Nanotechnology? -- Toward Anticipatory Governance: The Experience with Nanotechnology -- Which Ethics for (of) the Nanotechnologies? -- Deconstructing the Assessment Regime -- Lure of the “Yes”: The Seductive Power of Technoscience -- The Time of Science: Deliberation and the “New Governance” of Nanotechnology -- Converging Technologies – Diverging Reflexivities? Intellectual Work in Knowledge-Risk-Media-Audit Societies.
520 |aNanotechnology has been the subject of extensive ‘assessment hype,’ unlike any previous field of research and development. A multiplicity of stakeholders have started to analyze the implications of nanotechnology: Technology assessment institutions around the world, non-governmental organizations, think tanks, re-insurance companies, and academics from science and technology studies and applied ethics have turned their attention to this growing field’s implications. In the course of these assessment efforts, a social phenomenon has emerged – a phenomenon the editors define as assessment regime. Despite the variety of organizations, methods, and actors involved in the evaluation and regulation of emerging nanotechnologies, the assessment activities comply with an overarching scientific and political imperative: Innovations are only welcome if they are assessed against the criteria of safety, sustainability, desirability, and acceptability. So far, such deliberations and reflections have played only a subordinate role. This book argues that with the rise of the nanotechnology assessment regime, however, things have changed dramatically: Situated at the crossroads of democratizing science and technology, good governance, and the quest for sustainable innovations, the assessment regime has become constitutive for technological development. The contributions in this book explore and critically analyse nanotechnology’s assessment regime: To what extent is it constitutive for technology in general, for nanotechnology in particular? What social conditions render the regime a phenomenon sui generis? And what are its implications for science and society?
650 0|aScience|xHistory.
650 0|aScience|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aSociology.
650 0|aEthics.
650 14|aHistory of Science.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Science.
650 24|aSociology.
650 24|aMoral Philosophy and Applied Ethics.
700 1 |aKaiser, Mario.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aKurath, Monika.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aMaasen, Sabine.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aRehmann-Sutter, Christoph.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048128334
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048128358
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400730779
830 0|aSociology of the Sciences Yearbook,|x2215-1796 ;|v27
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2834-1
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXH
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aHistory (R0) (SpringerNature-43722)
Materyaller
Depodan talep edilen materyal sadece kütüphane içerisinde kullanılmaktadır.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
