LEADER 04355nam a22006015i 4500
001 807791
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127004816
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 130125s2000 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401714785|9978-94-017-1478-5
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-017-1478-5|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aBJ1-1725
072 7|aHPQ|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI005000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQDTQ|2thema
082 04|a170|223
090 |aDK/9084
100 1 |aRichter, D.J.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aEthics after Anscombe|h[electronic resource] :|bPost “Modern Moral Philosophy” /|cby D.J. Richter.
250 |a1st ed. 2000.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2000.
300 |aXII, 176 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aLibrary of Ethics and Applied Philosophy,|x2215-0323 ;|v5
505 0 |a1 — The Incoherence of the Moral ‘Ought’ -- 2 — Is Moral Philosophy Possible?: Wittgenstein and Anscombe -- 3 — How to do Moral Philosophy. Part 1: Lovibond and Bambrough -- 4 — How to do Moral Philosophy. Part 2: Virtue and Anti-Theory -- 5 — The Ethics of Suicide -- 6 — Persons, Babies and Martians: The Philosophy of Abortion -- 7 — Does Meat Mean Murder?.
520 |aHow, if at all, can we do moral philosophy in the light of the radical critique made by Elizabeth Anscombe in "Modem Moral Philosophy"? Among the principal theses of this essay is that ethical thinking (that of philosophers and others) suffers from a widespread appeal to incoherent uses of terms such as 'obligation,' 'ought,' 'right' and 'wrong. ' In this book I first explain and evaluate her thesis and the argument for it, and I then confront the challenge it poses: what ways are there of doing moral philosophy that avoid the kind of incoherence to which she has drawn our attention? The best way to show how it is possible for us to think about ethics is to demonstrate how to do so, using actual cases. This book therefore combines the critical study of central theoretical issues about ethics, in the first half, with concrete examination of serious practical issues, in the second. Following Dostoyevsky's Ivan Karamazov, it is often said that if God does not exist then everything is permitted. This is not literally the case, since God cannot permit anything if He does not exist, and those of us who do exist do not permit everything, or at least our parents, employers, and governments do not. It is true, though, that if God does not exist then nothing is forbidden in the traditional sense of 'forbidden'.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aEthics.
650 0|aOntology.
650 0|aPhilosophy, Modern.
650 0|aPhilosophy.
650 14|aMoral Philosophy and Applied Ethics.
650 24|aOntology.
650 24|aEarly Modern Philosophy.
650 24|aPhilosophy.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780792360933
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048153718
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401714792
830 0|aLibrary of Ethics and Applied Philosophy,|x2215-0323 ;|v5
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1478-5
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)