LEADER 03599nam a22005415i 4500
001 808050
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127005326
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 140415s2014 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783319056180|9978-3-319-05618-0
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-319-05618-0|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aLC1051-1072
050 4|aLC1041-1048
072 7|aJNRV|2bicssc
072 7|aEDU046000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJNRV|2thema
082 04|a370.113|223
090 |aDK/9342
100 1 |aClerke, Teena.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aDoing Ethnography in Teams|h[electronic resource] :|bA Case Study of Asymmetries in Collaborative Research /|cby Teena Clerke, Nick Hopwood.
250 |a1st ed. 2014.
264 1|aCham :|bSpringer International Publishing :|bImprint: Springer,|c2014.
300 |aX, 96 p. 22 illus.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aSpringerBriefs in Education,|x2211-193X
505 0 |aAcknowledgements -- Preface -- 1 Outline of the study and researcher backgrounds -- 2 Ethnography as collective research endeavor -- 3 Asymmetry in ethnographic fieldwork -- 4 Teamwork processes -- 5 Researcher reflections -- 6 Planning a team ethnography? -- Reference list -- Appendices.
520 |aThis uniquely in-depth book offers a blow-by-blow account of the sometimes problematic dynamics of conducting collaborative fieldwork in ethnography. Tracing the interplay between co-researchers at various points of contact in both professional and personal relations, the analysis draws out the asymmetries which can develop among team members nominally working towards the same ends. It details the often complex dialogues that evolve in an attempt to navigate conflicting interests, such as team members’ resistances to particular methodological ‘recipes’ or research protocols. The authors show that such debates can create an open forum to negotiate new practices. A key element of this publication is that it goes beyond an analysis of more traditional power relations in research teams comprising members at different academic pay grades. As well as drawing attention to gender-related dynamics in research collaborations, the authors use themselves as an exemplar to demonstrate how differences in age, experience, knowledge, professional skills, and background can be exploited to generate positive outcomes constituting much more than the apparent sum of their parts. In doing so, the authors reveal the delightful, surprising, and yet challenging aspects of research collaboration that are often absent from the qualitative literature.
650 0|aProfessional education.
650 0|aVocational education.
650 0|aSociology|xMethodology.
650 0|aAnthropology.
650 14|aProfessional and Vocational Education.
650 24|aSociological Methods.
650 24|aAnthropology.
700 1 |aHopwood, Nick.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319056173
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319056197
830 0|aSpringerBriefs in Education,|x2211-193X
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05618-0
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXED
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aEducation (R0) (SpringerNature-43721)