Trusting Records [electronic resource] : Legal, Historical and Diplomatic Perspectives / by H. MacNeil.
Erişim Adresi
ISBN
9789401593755
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/9563
Yazar
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 2000.
Yayın Bilgisi
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2000.
Fiziksel Niteleme
XIV, 163 p. online resource.
Dizi
The Archivist's Library ; 1
İçindekiler Notu
1 The Evolution of Legal and Historical Methods for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Records -- 1.1 The Roman Era -- 1.2 The Middle Ages -- 1.3 The Renaissance -- 1.4 The Seventeenth Century -- 1.5 Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Developments in Evidence Law -- 1.6 Nineteenth-Century Developments in Historical Method -- 1.7 Conclusion -- 2 Trusting Records as Legal Evidence: Common Law Rules of Evidence -- 2.1 Common law vs. Civil law Procedure -- 2.2 Rules Governing the Admissibility of Documentary Evidence -- 2.3 Admissibility of Electronic Records -- 2.4 The Role of the Adversarial Process in the Legal Assessment of Record Trustworthiness -- 2.5 Conclusion -- 3 Trusting Records as Historical Evidence: Modern Historical Methods -- 3.1 Framework of Modernist Historical Methods -- 3.2 The External and Internal Criticism of a Record -- 3.3 Postmodernist Critiques of Historical Method -- 3.4 Challenges to Historical Method posed by Electronic Records -- 3.5 Conclusion -- 4 Creating and Maintaining Trustworthy Records in Electronic Systems: Archival Diplomatic Methods -- 4.1 Modern Diplomatics -- 4.2 The Application of Diplomatics to the Records of Twentieth-Century Bureaucracies -- 4.3 Contemporary Archival Diplomatics: The University of British Columbia Project -- 4.4 Limits to Ensuring Record Trustworthiness in a Bureaucracy -- 4.5 Conclusion -- Conclusion -- Notes.
Özet, vb.
A trustworthy record is one that is both an accurate statement of facts and a genuine manifestation of those facts. Record trustworthiness thus has two qualitative dimensions: reliability and authenticity. Reliability means that the record is capable of standing for the facts to which it attests, while authenticity means that the record is what it claims to be. This study explores the evolution of the principles and methods for determining record trustworthiness from antiquity to the digital age, and from the perspectives of law and history. It also examines recent efforts undertaken by researchers in the field of archival science to develop methods for ensuring the trustworthiness of records created and maintained in electronic systems. Audience: The target audience for this study is legal scholars working in the field of evidence law, historians working in the field of historical methodology, and recordkeeping professionals (records managers, information technology specialists, archivists) working on the design and implementation of contemporary organizational recordkeeping systems.
Konu
Cultural property.
Electronic data processing __ Management.
Law __ Philosophy.
Law __ History.
Philology.
Cultural Heritage.
IT Operations.
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
Philology.
Electronic data processing __ Management.
Law __ Philosophy.
Law __ History.
Philology.
Cultural Heritage.
IT Operations.
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
Philology.
Kurum Adı
Eseri Alıntıla
Referansları kullanmadan önce gözden geçirmeniz ve varsa gerekli düzeltmeleri yapmanız önerilir.
Dijital Kaynak
MARC Görünümü
LEADER 05239nam a22006375i 4500
001 808274
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131032023
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121205s2000 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401593755|9978-94-015-9375-5
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-015-9375-5|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aD1-2027
072 7|aJFC|2bicssc
072 7|aGM|2bicssc
072 7|aSOC002010|2bisacsh
072 7|aJBCC|2thema
072 7|aGLZ|2thema
082 04|a363.69|223
090 |aDK/9563
100 1 |aMacNeil, H.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aTrusting Records|h[electronic resource] :|bLegal, Historical and Diplomatic Perspectives /|cby H. MacNeil.
250 |a1st ed. 2000.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2000.
300 |aXIV, 163 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aThe Archivist's Library ;|v1
505 0 |a1 The Evolution of Legal and Historical Methods for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Records -- 1.1 The Roman Era -- 1.2 The Middle Ages -- 1.3 The Renaissance -- 1.4 The Seventeenth Century -- 1.5 Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Developments in Evidence Law -- 1.6 Nineteenth-Century Developments in Historical Method -- 1.7 Conclusion -- 2 Trusting Records as Legal Evidence: Common Law Rules of Evidence -- 2.1 Common law vs. Civil law Procedure -- 2.2 Rules Governing the Admissibility of Documentary Evidence -- 2.3 Admissibility of Electronic Records -- 2.4 The Role of the Adversarial Process in the Legal Assessment of Record Trustworthiness -- 2.5 Conclusion -- 3 Trusting Records as Historical Evidence: Modern Historical Methods -- 3.1 Framework of Modernist Historical Methods -- 3.2 The External and Internal Criticism of a Record -- 3.3 Postmodernist Critiques of Historical Method -- 3.4 Challenges to Historical Method posed by Electronic Records -- 3.5 Conclusion -- 4 Creating and Maintaining Trustworthy Records in Electronic Systems: Archival Diplomatic Methods -- 4.1 Modern Diplomatics -- 4.2 The Application of Diplomatics to the Records of Twentieth-Century Bureaucracies -- 4.3 Contemporary Archival Diplomatics: The University of British Columbia Project -- 4.4 Limits to Ensuring Record Trustworthiness in a Bureaucracy -- 4.5 Conclusion -- Conclusion -- Notes.
520 |aA trustworthy record is one that is both an accurate statement of facts and a genuine manifestation of those facts. Record trustworthiness thus has two qualitative dimensions: reliability and authenticity. Reliability means that the record is capable of standing for the facts to which it attests, while authenticity means that the record is what it claims to be. This study explores the evolution of the principles and methods for determining record trustworthiness from antiquity to the digital age, and from the perspectives of law and history. It also examines recent efforts undertaken by researchers in the field of archival science to develop methods for ensuring the trustworthiness of records created and maintained in electronic systems. Audience: The target audience for this study is legal scholars working in the field of evidence law, historians working in the field of historical methodology, and recordkeeping professionals (records managers, information technology specialists, archivists) working on the design and implementation of contemporary organizational recordkeeping systems.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aCultural property.
650 0|aElectronic data processing|xManagement.
650 0|aLaw|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aLaw|xHistory.
650 0|aPhilology.
650 14|aCultural Heritage.
650 24|aIT Operations.
650 24|aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
650 24|aPhilology.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780792365990
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048155729
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401593762
830 0|aThe Archivist's Library ;|v1
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9375-5
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXL
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43723)
001 808274
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131032023
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121205s2000 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401593755|9978-94-015-9375-5
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-015-9375-5|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aD1-2027
072 7|aJFC|2bicssc
072 7|aGM|2bicssc
072 7|aSOC002010|2bisacsh
072 7|aJBCC|2thema
072 7|aGLZ|2thema
082 04|a363.69|223
090 |aDK/9563
100 1 |aMacNeil, H.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aTrusting Records|h[electronic resource] :|bLegal, Historical and Diplomatic Perspectives /|cby H. MacNeil.
250 |a1st ed. 2000.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2000.
300 |aXIV, 163 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aThe Archivist's Library ;|v1
505 0 |a1 The Evolution of Legal and Historical Methods for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Records -- 1.1 The Roman Era -- 1.2 The Middle Ages -- 1.3 The Renaissance -- 1.4 The Seventeenth Century -- 1.5 Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Developments in Evidence Law -- 1.6 Nineteenth-Century Developments in Historical Method -- 1.7 Conclusion -- 2 Trusting Records as Legal Evidence: Common Law Rules of Evidence -- 2.1 Common law vs. Civil law Procedure -- 2.2 Rules Governing the Admissibility of Documentary Evidence -- 2.3 Admissibility of Electronic Records -- 2.4 The Role of the Adversarial Process in the Legal Assessment of Record Trustworthiness -- 2.5 Conclusion -- 3 Trusting Records as Historical Evidence: Modern Historical Methods -- 3.1 Framework of Modernist Historical Methods -- 3.2 The External and Internal Criticism of a Record -- 3.3 Postmodernist Critiques of Historical Method -- 3.4 Challenges to Historical Method posed by Electronic Records -- 3.5 Conclusion -- 4 Creating and Maintaining Trustworthy Records in Electronic Systems: Archival Diplomatic Methods -- 4.1 Modern Diplomatics -- 4.2 The Application of Diplomatics to the Records of Twentieth-Century Bureaucracies -- 4.3 Contemporary Archival Diplomatics: The University of British Columbia Project -- 4.4 Limits to Ensuring Record Trustworthiness in a Bureaucracy -- 4.5 Conclusion -- Conclusion -- Notes.
520 |aA trustworthy record is one that is both an accurate statement of facts and a genuine manifestation of those facts. Record trustworthiness thus has two qualitative dimensions: reliability and authenticity. Reliability means that the record is capable of standing for the facts to which it attests, while authenticity means that the record is what it claims to be. This study explores the evolution of the principles and methods for determining record trustworthiness from antiquity to the digital age, and from the perspectives of law and history. It also examines recent efforts undertaken by researchers in the field of archival science to develop methods for ensuring the trustworthiness of records created and maintained in electronic systems. Audience: The target audience for this study is legal scholars working in the field of evidence law, historians working in the field of historical methodology, and recordkeeping professionals (records managers, information technology specialists, archivists) working on the design and implementation of contemporary organizational recordkeeping systems.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aCultural property.
650 0|aElectronic data processing|xManagement.
650 0|aLaw|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aLaw|xHistory.
650 0|aPhilology.
650 14|aCultural Heritage.
650 24|aIT Operations.
650 24|aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
650 24|aPhilology.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780792365990
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048155729
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401593762
830 0|aThe Archivist's Library ;|v1
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9375-5
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXL
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43723)
Materyaller
Depodan talep edilen materyal sadece kütüphane içerisinde kullanılmaktadır.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
