LEADER 03352nam a22005775i 4500
001 808658
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131025958
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 120818s2013 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789400749917|9978-94-007-4991-7
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-007-4991-7|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aK201-487
050 4|aK140-165
072 7|aLAB|2bicssc
072 7|aLAW000000|2bisacsh
072 7|aLAB|2thema
082 04|a340.1|223
090 |aDK/9947
100 1 |aPalazzani, Laura.|eauthor.|0(orcid)0000-0001-9870-1304|1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9870-1304|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aGender in Philosophy and Law|h[electronic resource] /|cby Laura Palazzani.
250 |a1st ed. 2013.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2013.
300 |aXIV, 116 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aSpringerBriefs in Law,|x2192-8568
505 0 |aTable Of Contents -- Introduction -- Chapter I: From Sex To Gender -- Chapter II: From Gender To Queer -- Chapter III: Gender: From Theory To Law -- Chapter IV: Identity And Equality In Sexual Difference -- Glossary -- Bibliography.
520 |aThis book is an introductory systematic framework in the complex and interdisciplinary sex/gender debate, focusing on philosophy of law.The volume analyses the different theories that have dealt with the gender category, highlighting the conceptual premises and the arguments of the most influential theories in the debate, which have had repercussions on the field of the ethical and juridical debate (with reference to intersexuality, transsexualism, transgender, homosexuality). The aim is to offer a sort of conceptual orientation in the complexity of the debate, in an effort to identify the various aspects and development processes of  the theories, so as to highlight the conceptual elements of the theorisations to grasp the problem areas within them. It is therefore an overall synthetic and also explicative analysis, but not only explicative: the aim is to outline the arguments supporting the different theories and the counter-arguments too, for the purpose of proposing categories to weigh up the elements and to take one’s own critical stance, with a methodological style that is neither descriptive nor prescriptive, but critical.       .
650 0|aLaw|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aLaw|xHistory.
650 0|aSex.
650 0|aHuman physiology.
650 0|aSocial structure.
650 0|aEquality.
650 14|aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
650 24|aGender Studies.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Law.
650 24|aHuman Physiology.
650 24|aSocial Structure.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400749900
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400749924
830 0|aSpringerBriefs in Law,|x2192-8568
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4991-7
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXLC
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aLaw and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)