LEADER 04080nam a22005295i 4500
001 809436
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131023218
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1982 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789400974555|9978-94-009-7455-5
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-009-7455-5|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aT14
072 7|aHP|2bicssc
072 7|aTB|2bicssc
072 7|aSCI075000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQD|2thema
072 7|aTB|2thema
082 04|a601|223
090 |aDK/10725
100 1 |aFeibleman, J.K.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aTechnology and Reality|h[electronic resource] /|cby J.K. Feibleman.
250 |a1st ed. 1982.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1982.
300 |aXII, 210 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aOne. Nature -- I Introduction: The Background -- II Matter -- III Universals: The Forms -- IV Universals: The Qualities -- V The Universe -- Two. Human Nature -- VI Man: Needs and Drives -- VII Man: Perversity -- VIII Mind: Perception -- IX Mind: Conception -- X Morality: The Good -- XI Morality: The Bad -- XII Rhetoric -- XIII Politics -- XIV Art -- XV Religion -- XVI Conclusion: The Foreground.
520 |aIn the following pages I have endeavored to show the impact on philosophy of tech nology and science; more specifically, I have tried to make up for the neglect by the classical philosophers of the historic role of technology and also to suggest what positive effects on philosophy the ahnost daily advances in the physical sciences might have. Above all, I wanted to remind the ontologist of his debt to the artificer: tech nology with its recent gigantic achievements has introduced a new ingredient into the world, and so is sure to influence our knowledge of what there is. This book, then, could as well have been called 'Ethnotechnology: An Explanation of Human Behavior by Means of Material Culture', but the picture is a complex one, and there are many more special problems that need to be prominently featured in the discussion. Human culture never goes forward on all fronts at the same time. In our era it is unquestionably not only technology but also the sciences which are making the most rapid progress. Philosophy has not been very successful at keeping up with them. As a consequence there is an 'enormous gulf between scientists and philosophers today, a gulf which is as large as it has ever been. ' (1) I can see that with science moving so rapidly, its current lessons for philosophy might well be outmoded tomorrow.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aTechnology|xPhilosophy.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Technology.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789024725199
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400974562
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400974579
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7455-5
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
