LEADER 03769nam a22005295i 4500
001 810303
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131020405
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1963 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401187947|9978-94-011-8794-7
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-011-8794-7|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aBL
072 7|aHRA|2bicssc
072 7|aREL000000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQRA|2thema
082 04|a200|223
090 |aDK/11582
100 1 |aLocke, John.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 12|aA Letter Concerning Toleration|h[electronic resource] :|bLatin and English Texts Revised and Edited with Variants and an Introduction /|cby John Locke ; edited by Mario Montuori.
250 |a1st ed. 1963.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1963.
300 |a123 p. 5 illus.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aA Letter Concerning Toleration -- Epistola de Tolerantia -- Index of names.
520 |aLimborch's edition and Popple's translation, as on whether it is true that Popple translated the Epistola into English 'a l'insu de Mr Locke', and consequently whether Locke was right or wrong in saying that the translation was made 'without my privity'. Long research into documents hitherto unpublished, or little known, or badly used, has persuaded me that Locke not only knew that Popple had undertaken to translate the Gouda Latin text, but also that Locke followed Popple's work very closely, and even that the second English edition of 1690 was edited by Locke himself. In these circumstances it does not seem possible to speak of an original text, that in Latin, and an English translation; rather they are two different versions of Locke's thoughts on Toleration. The accusations of unreliability levelled at Popple therefore fall to the ground, and the Latin and English texts acquire equal rights to our trust, since they both deserve the same place among Locke's works. Consequently the expression 'without my privity', which a number of people had seen as revealing an innate weakness in Locke's moral character, reacquires its precise meaning: testifying to Locke's profound modesty and integrity.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aReligion.
650 0|aPhilosophy of mind.
650 14|aReligion.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Mind.
700 1 |aMontuori, Mario.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401181600
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401187954
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8794-7
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)