On the Motives which led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism [electronic resource] / by Roman S. Ingarden.
Erişim Adresi
ISBN
9789401016896
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/11971
Yazar
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 1975.
Yayın Bilgisi
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 1975.
Fiziksel Niteleme
VIII, 72 p. online resource.
Dizi
Phaenomenologica, Series Founded by H. L. Van Breda and Published Under the Auspices of the Husserl-Archives, 2215-0331 ; 64
İçindekiler Notu
I: Husserl’s Position -- 1. The original realist standpoint -- 2. The concept of philosophy as rigorous science -- 3. Postulates determining the appropriate method of epistemology -- 4. The results of the investigations into outer perception and the constitutive analysis of objects of the real world -- 5. The formal-ontological foundations of the idealist solution -- II: Critical Remarks -- 1. Must the concept of philosophy as rigorous science lead to transcendental idealism ? -- 2. The limits of the applicability of the phenomenological reduction -- 3. Critical remarks on particular results of the analysis of outer perception and the theory of constitution -- 4. Critical remarks on the formal-ontological sources of the Husserlian idealism.
Özet, vb.
Roman Ingarden studied under Husserl before and during the first world war. He belonged to the so-called Gottingen group of Husserl's pupils. Husserl's doctrine was accepted by them and interpreted in a realist vein. Ingarden defended this view all his life. He opposed the development of phenomenology towards idealism. A considerable part of Ingarden's great creative effort is dedicated to the construction of a realist phenomenology and thus, according to him, to continuing the erection of the theoret ical structure whose foundations were laid by Husserl in his Logical Investigations. From Ingarden's standpoint the question of idealism versus realism was a crucial one. Ingarden published several studies on Husserl. The first one was written in 1918 and the last one was published posthumously. The present essay was printed in Ingarden's book Z badan nad filozofi:t wsp61czesn:t- (Inquiries into Contemporary Philosophy 1963) along with a number of other essays on Husserl and his philoso phy. This one is representative for Ingarden's positions. It is a good example of his contribution to an important controversy in the history of phenomenology, and it gives the reader an idea of Ingarden's critique of Husserlian idealism against the background of his argument for realism. Thanks and acknowledgements are due to Mr. J. E. Llewelyn of Edinburgh University. This translation was undertaken in collaboration with him. Arn6r Hannibalsson K6pavogur, Iceland 2I. II.
Konu
Phenomenology .
Phenomenology.
Phenomenology.
Kurum Adı
Eseri Alıntıla
Referansları kullanmadan önce gözden geçirmeniz ve varsa gerekli düzeltmeleri yapmanız önerilir.
Dijital Kaynak
MARC Görünümü
LEADER 04798nam a22005175i 4500
001 810698
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131014236
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1975 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401016896|9978-94-010-1689-6
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-010-1689-6|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aB829.5.A-Z
072 7|aHPCF3|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI018000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQDHR5|2thema
082 04|a142.7|223
090 |aDK/11971
100 1 |aIngarden, Roman S.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aOn the Motives which led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism|h[electronic resource] /|cby Roman S. Ingarden.
250 |a1st ed. 1975.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1975.
300 |aVIII, 72 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aPhaenomenologica, Series Founded by H. L. Van Breda and Published Under the Auspices of the Husserl-Archives,|x2215-0331 ;|v64
505 0 |aI: Husserl’s Position -- 1. The original realist standpoint -- 2. The concept of philosophy as rigorous science -- 3. Postulates determining the appropriate method of epistemology -- 4. The results of the investigations into outer perception and the constitutive analysis of objects of the real world -- 5. The formal-ontological foundations of the idealist solution -- II: Critical Remarks -- 1. Must the concept of philosophy as rigorous science lead to transcendental idealism ? -- 2. The limits of the applicability of the phenomenological reduction -- 3. Critical remarks on particular results of the analysis of outer perception and the theory of constitution -- 4. Critical remarks on the formal-ontological sources of the Husserlian idealism.
520 |aRoman Ingarden studied under Husserl before and during the first world war. He belonged to the so-called Gottingen group of Husserl's pupils. Husserl's doctrine was accepted by them and interpreted in a realist vein. Ingarden defended this view all his life. He opposed the development of phenomenology towards idealism. A considerable part of Ingarden's great creative effort is dedicated to the construction of a realist phenomenology and thus, according to him, to continuing the erection of the theoret ical structure whose foundations were laid by Husserl in his Logical Investigations. From Ingarden's standpoint the question of idealism versus realism was a crucial one. Ingarden published several studies on Husserl. The first one was written in 1918 and the last one was published posthumously. The present essay was printed in Ingarden's book Z badan nad filozofi:t wsp61czesn:t- (Inquiries into Contemporary Philosophy 1963) along with a number of other essays on Husserl and his philoso phy. This one is representative for Ingarden's positions. It is a good example of his contribution to an important controversy in the history of phenomenology, and it gives the reader an idea of Ingarden's critique of Husserlian idealism against the background of his argument for realism. Thanks and acknowledgements are due to Mr. J. E. Llewelyn of Edinburgh University. This translation was undertaken in collaboration with him. Arn6r Hannibalsson K6pavogur, Iceland 2I. II.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aPhenomenology .
650 14|aPhenomenology.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789024717514
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401016902
830 0|aPhaenomenologica, Series Founded by H. L. Van Breda and Published Under the Auspices of the Husserl-Archives,|x2215-0331 ;|v64
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1689-6
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
001 810698
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131014236
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1975 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401016896|9978-94-010-1689-6
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-010-1689-6|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aB829.5.A-Z
072 7|aHPCF3|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI018000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQDHR5|2thema
082 04|a142.7|223
090 |aDK/11971
100 1 |aIngarden, Roman S.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aOn the Motives which led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism|h[electronic resource] /|cby Roman S. Ingarden.
250 |a1st ed. 1975.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1975.
300 |aVIII, 72 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aPhaenomenologica, Series Founded by H. L. Van Breda and Published Under the Auspices of the Husserl-Archives,|x2215-0331 ;|v64
505 0 |aI: Husserl’s Position -- 1. The original realist standpoint -- 2. The concept of philosophy as rigorous science -- 3. Postulates determining the appropriate method of epistemology -- 4. The results of the investigations into outer perception and the constitutive analysis of objects of the real world -- 5. The formal-ontological foundations of the idealist solution -- II: Critical Remarks -- 1. Must the concept of philosophy as rigorous science lead to transcendental idealism ? -- 2. The limits of the applicability of the phenomenological reduction -- 3. Critical remarks on particular results of the analysis of outer perception and the theory of constitution -- 4. Critical remarks on the formal-ontological sources of the Husserlian idealism.
520 |aRoman Ingarden studied under Husserl before and during the first world war. He belonged to the so-called Gottingen group of Husserl's pupils. Husserl's doctrine was accepted by them and interpreted in a realist vein. Ingarden defended this view all his life. He opposed the development of phenomenology towards idealism. A considerable part of Ingarden's great creative effort is dedicated to the construction of a realist phenomenology and thus, according to him, to continuing the erection of the theoret ical structure whose foundations were laid by Husserl in his Logical Investigations. From Ingarden's standpoint the question of idealism versus realism was a crucial one. Ingarden published several studies on Husserl. The first one was written in 1918 and the last one was published posthumously. The present essay was printed in Ingarden's book Z badan nad filozofi:t wsp61czesn:t- (Inquiries into Contemporary Philosophy 1963) along with a number of other essays on Husserl and his philoso phy. This one is representative for Ingarden's positions. It is a good example of his contribution to an important controversy in the history of phenomenology, and it gives the reader an idea of Ingarden's critique of Husserlian idealism against the background of his argument for realism. Thanks and acknowledgements are due to Mr. J. E. Llewelyn of Edinburgh University. This translation was undertaken in collaboration with him. Arn6r Hannibalsson K6pavogur, Iceland 2I. II.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aPhenomenology .
650 14|aPhenomenology.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789024717514
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401016902
830 0|aPhaenomenologica, Series Founded by H. L. Van Breda and Published Under the Auspices of the Husserl-Archives,|x2215-0331 ;|v64
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1689-6
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
Materyaller
Depodan talep edilen materyal sadece kütüphane içerisinde kullanılmaktadır.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
