LEADER 03688nam a22005775i 4500
001 810749
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131013959
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2004 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9781402020414|9978-1-4020-2041-4
024 7 |a10.1007/1-4020-2041-4|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aB1-5802
072 7|aHPC|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI009000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQDH|2thema
082 04|a109|223
090 |aDK/12022
100 1 |aHintikka, Jaakko.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aAnalyses of Aristotle|h[electronic resource] /|cby Jaakko Hintikka.
250 |a1st ed. 2004.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2004.
300 |aXII, 238 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aJaakko Hintikka Selected Papers ;|v6
505 0 |aOn Aristotle’s Notion of Existence -- Semantical Games, the Alleged Ambiguity of “Is”, and Aristotelian Categories -- Aristotle’s Theory of Thinking and Its Consequences for His Methodology -- On the Role of Modality in Aristotle’s Metaphysics -- On the Ingredients of An Aristotelian Science -- Aristotelian Axiomatics and Geometrical Axiomotics -- Aristotelian Induction -- Aristotelian Explanations -- Aristotle’s Incontinent Logician -- On the Development of Aristotle’s Ideas of Scientific Method and the Structure of Science -- What Was Aristotle Doing in His Early Logic, Anyway? A Reply to Woods and Hansen -- Concepts of Scientific Method from Aristotle to Newton -- The Fallacy of Fallacies -- Socratic Questioning, Logic and Rhetoric.
520 |aAristotle thought of his logic and methodology as applications of the Socratic questioning method. In particular, logic was originally a study of answers necessitated by earlier answers. For Aristotle, thought-experiments were real experiments in the sense that by realizing forms in one's mind, one can read off their properties and interrelations. Treating forms as independent entities, knowable one by one, committed Aristotle to his mode of syllogistic explanation. He did not think of existence, predication and identity as separate senses of estin. Aristotle thus serves as an example of a thinker who did not rely on the distinction between the allegedly different Fregean senses, thereby shedding new light on our own conceptual presuppositions. This collection comprises several striking interpretations that Jaakko Hintikka has put forward over the years, constituting a challenge not only to Aristotelian scholars and historians of ideas, but to everyone interested in logic, epistemology or metaphysics and in their history.
650 0|aPhilosophy|xHistory.
650 0|aHistory.
650 0|aPhilosophy, Ancient.
650 0|aKnowledge, Theory of.
650 0|aOntology.
650 14|aHistory of Philosophy.
650 24|aHistory.
650 24|aAncient Philosophy / Classical Philosophy.
650 24|aEpistemology.
650 24|aOntology.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402020407
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048165780
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401740180
830 0|aJaakko Hintikka Selected Papers ;|v6
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2041-4
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)