Mississippian Community Organization [electronic resource] : The Powers Phase in Southeastern Missouri / by Michael J. O'Brien.

Erişim Adresi
Link
ISBN
9780306471964
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/12045
Yazar
O'Brien, Michael J.
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 2002.
Yayın Bilgisi
New York, NY : Springer US : Imprint: Springer, 2002.
Fiziksel Niteleme
XXIII, 327 p. online resource.
Dizi
Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology, 2730-6984
İçindekiler Notu
The Powers Phase: An Introduction -- The General Physical and Cultural Environment -- The Physical-Environmental Context of Powers Phase Settlements -- Powers Phase Settlement in the Western Lowlands -- Community Organization and Dates of Occupation -- The Construction and Abandonment of Powers Phase Structures -- The Artifactual Content of Selected House Floors at Turner and Snodgrass -- Stone Artifacts from Turner and Snodgrass -- Pottery from Turner and Snodgrass -- Concluding Remarks.
Özet, vb.
The Powers Phase Project was a multiyear archaeological program undertaken in southeastern Missouri by the University of Michigan in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The project focused on the occupation of a large Pleistocene-age terrace in the Little Black River Lowland—a large expanse of lowlying land just east of the Ozark Highland—between roughly A. D. 1250 and A. D. 1400. The largest site in the region is Powers Fort—a palisaded mound center that - ceived archaeological attention as early as the late nineteenth century. Archa- logical surveys conducted south of Powers Fort in the 1960s revealed the pr- ence of numerous smaller sites of varying size that contained artifact assemblages similar to those from the larger center. Collectively the settlement aggregation became known as the Powers phase. Test excavations indicated that at least some of the smaller sites contained burned structures and that the burning had sealed household items on the floors below the collapsed architectural e- ments. Thus there appeared to be an opportunity to examine a late prehistoric settlement system to a degree not possible previously. Not only could the s- tial relation of communities in the system be ascertained, but the fact that str- tures within the communities had burned appeared to provide a unique opp- tunity to examine such things as differences in household items between and among structures and where various activities had occurred within a house. With these ideas in mind, James B. Griffin and James E.
Konu
Archaeology.
Anthropology.
Archaeology.
Anthropology.
Kurum Adı
SpringerLink (Online service)
İşlemler