LEADER 03708nam a22005655i 4500
001 810920
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131013143
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s1994 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9780306482182|9978-0-306-48218-2
024 7 |a10.1007/b101823|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aK4456-4590
072 7|aLNU|2bicssc
072 7|aLAW086000|2bisacsh
072 7|aLNU|2thema
082 04|a343.04|223
090 |aDK/12186
100 1 |aKing, Elizabeth.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aTransfer Pricing and Valuation in Corporate Taxation|h[electronic resource] :|bFederal Legislation vs. Administrative Practice /|cby Elizabeth King.
250 |a1st ed. 1994.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1994.
300 |aXVIII, 284 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aLegislation and Regulations -- Transfer Pricing and Valuation Regulations -- Transfer Pricing and Valuation Regulations in Practive -- The Cost-plus Method -- The Resale Price Method -- Cost-sharing Agreements -- Intra-company Royalty Agreements -- Valuation of Intangible Assets: Section 338 -- Conclusions and Policy Recommendations.
520 |aTransfer Pricing and Valuation in Corporate Taxation analyzes the disparities between both federal statutes and regulations, and r- ulations and administrative practice, in a highly controversial area of corporate tax policy: intra-company transfer pricing for tax p- poses. It addresses issues that often mean millions of dollars to in- vidual corporations, and a significant fraction of the federal gove- ment’s revenue base. These disparities between law, regulations, and administrative practice are concerning on a number of grounds. First, they - pose considerable economic costs by inducing corporations to engage in a variety of “rent-seeking” activities designed to reduce their - pected tax liabilities, and by requiring the IRS to devote still more to enforcement efforts that are very often futile. Second, they are in- ; herently undemocratic. Administrative practice is currently ad hoc by relying on dispute resolution procedures that can and do yield very different settlements on disputed tax issues from one case to another, the IRS often ends up treating similarly situated cor- rations very differently. Moreover, to the extent that the disp- ity between statute and implementation reflects the IRS’s failure to carry out Congress’ will, the laws passed by duly elected officials are effectively being superseded by administrative procedure, developed incrementally by individuals who are not answerable to an electorate.
650 0|aTaxation|xLaw and legislation.
650 0|aEconomics.
650 0|aBusiness enterprises|xTaxation.
650 0|aBusiness tax|xLaw and legislation.
650 0|aFinance, Public.
650 0|aCommercial law.
650 14|aFiscal Law.
650 24|aEconomics.
650 24|aBusiness Taxation and Tax Law.
650 24|aPublic Economics.
650 24|aCommercial Law.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780792393924
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401737678
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401737685
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/b101823
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXLC
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aLaw and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)