Population Change and Rural Society [electronic resource] / edited by William A. Kandel, David L. Brown.
Erişim Adresi
ISBN
9781402039027
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/12351
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 2006.
Yayın Bilgisi
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2006.
Fiziksel Niteleme
XIX, 467 p. online resource.
Dizi
The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, 2215-1990 ; 16
İçindekiler Notu
and Demographic Context -- Rural America through a Demographic Lens -- The Rural Rebound and its Aftermath -- Four Critical Socio-Demographic Themes -- The Changing Faces of Rural America -- Changing Livelihoods in Rural America -- Fifty Years of Farmland Change -- Changing Fortunes -- Case Studies of Population and Society in Different Rural Regions -- Rural Hispanic Population Growth -- Social Integration Among Older in-Migrants in Nonmetropolitan Retirement Destination Counties -- Agricultural Dependence and Changing Population in the Great Plains -- Gaming, Population Change, and Rural Development on Indian Reservations -- Metro Expansion and Nonmetro Change in the South -- Changing Land Use in the Rural Intermountain West -- Does Second Home Development Adversely Affect Rural Life? -- Housing Affordability and Population Chang in the Upper Midwestern North Woods -- Social Change and Well-Being in Western Amenity-Growth Communities -- Community Evaluation and Migration Intentions -- Poverty and Income Inequality in Appalachia -- Welfare Reform Amidst Chronic Poverty in the Mississippi Delta -- New Analytic Directions and Policy Implications -- Explorations in Spatial Demography -- Policy Implications of Rural Demographic Change.
Özet, vb.
CALVIN L. BEALE In considering how to introduce the subject of rural population change in st the 21 Century, I ?nd myself re?ecting on my own experience as a demographer for the U. S. Department of Agriculture. When I arrived at the Department, the post-World War II modernization of farming was well under way. Each year, my colleague Gladys Bowles and I had the unpopular task of announcing how much the farm population had decreased in the prior year. It was hard to say that the phenomenon was someone’s fault. Dramatic reductions in labor requirements per unit of agricultural output were occurring everywhere and not just in the United States. But politically, blame had to be assigned, and whichever political party was not in the White House was certain to place the blame squarely on the current administration. The demographic consequences of this trend were major. In a 22-year period from 1941 to 1962, the net loss of farm population from migration and cessation of farming averaged over a million people per year. It took eight years after the war before an administration was willing to begin to talk about the need to diversify rural employment. By that time, farm residents had already become a minority of rural people. However, well into the 1970s, I continued to receive inquiries from people who still equated rural with farm or who could not envision what rural-nonfarm people did for a living.
Konu
Demography.
Population.
Sociology.
Regional economics.
Spatial economics.
Economic geography.
Human geography.
Population and Demography.
Sociology.
Regional and Spatial Economics.
Economic Geography.
Human Geography.
Population.
Sociology.
Regional economics.
Spatial economics.
Economic geography.
Human geography.
Population and Demography.
Sociology.
Regional and Spatial Economics.
Economic Geography.
Human Geography.
Diğer Yazarlar
Kurum Adı
Eseri Alıntıla
Referansları kullanmadan önce gözden geçirmeniz ve varsa gerekli düzeltmeleri yapmanız önerilir.
Dijital Kaynak
MARC Görünümü
LEADER 04827nam a22006015i 4500
001 811086
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131012301
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2006 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9781402039027|9978-1-4020-3902-7
024 7 |a10.1007/1-4020-3902-6|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aHB848-3697
072 7|aJHBD|2bicssc
072 7|aSOC006000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJHBD|2thema
082 04|a304.6|223
090 |aDK/12351
245 10|aPopulation Change and Rural Society|h[electronic resource] /|cedited by William A. Kandel, David L. Brown.
250 |a1st ed. 2006.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2006.
300 |aXIX, 467 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aThe Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis,|x2215-1990 ;|v16
505 0 |aand Demographic Context -- Rural America through a Demographic Lens -- The Rural Rebound and its Aftermath -- Four Critical Socio-Demographic Themes -- The Changing Faces of Rural America -- Changing Livelihoods in Rural America -- Fifty Years of Farmland Change -- Changing Fortunes -- Case Studies of Population and Society in Different Rural Regions -- Rural Hispanic Population Growth -- Social Integration Among Older in-Migrants in Nonmetropolitan Retirement Destination Counties -- Agricultural Dependence and Changing Population in the Great Plains -- Gaming, Population Change, and Rural Development on Indian Reservations -- Metro Expansion and Nonmetro Change in the South -- Changing Land Use in the Rural Intermountain West -- Does Second Home Development Adversely Affect Rural Life? -- Housing Affordability and Population Chang in the Upper Midwestern North Woods -- Social Change and Well-Being in Western Amenity-Growth Communities -- Community Evaluation and Migration Intentions -- Poverty and Income Inequality in Appalachia -- Welfare Reform Amidst Chronic Poverty in the Mississippi Delta -- New Analytic Directions and Policy Implications -- Explorations in Spatial Demography -- Policy Implications of Rural Demographic Change.
520 |aCALVIN L. BEALE In considering how to introduce the subject of rural population change in st the 21 Century, I ?nd myself re?ecting on my own experience as a demographer for the U. S. Department of Agriculture. When I arrived at the Department, the post-World War II modernization of farming was well under way. Each year, my colleague Gladys Bowles and I had the unpopular task of announcing how much the farm population had decreased in the prior year. It was hard to say that the phenomenon was someone’s fault. Dramatic reductions in labor requirements per unit of agricultural output were occurring everywhere and not just in the United States. But politically, blame had to be assigned, and whichever political party was not in the White House was certain to place the blame squarely on the current administration. The demographic consequences of this trend were major. In a 22-year period from 1941 to 1962, the net loss of farm population from migration and cessation of farming averaged over a million people per year. It took eight years after the war before an administration was willing to begin to talk about the need to diversify rural employment. By that time, farm residents had already become a minority of rural people. However, well into the 1970s, I continued to receive inquiries from people who still equated rural with farm or who could not envision what rural-nonfarm people did for a living.
650 0|aDemography.
650 0|aPopulation.
650 0|aSociology.
650 0|aRegional economics.
650 0|aSpatial economics.
650 0|aEconomic geography.
650 0|aHuman geography.
650 14|aPopulation and Demography.
650 24|aSociology.
650 24|aRegional and Spatial Economics.
650 24|aEconomic Geography.
650 24|aHuman Geography.
700 1 |aKandel, William A.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aBrown, David L.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402039119
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402039010
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048105168
830 0|aThe Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis,|x2215-1990 ;|v16
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3902-6
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXS
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aSocial Sciences (R0) (SpringerNature-43726)
001 811086
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131012301
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2006 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9781402039027|9978-1-4020-3902-7
024 7 |a10.1007/1-4020-3902-6|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aHB848-3697
072 7|aJHBD|2bicssc
072 7|aSOC006000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJHBD|2thema
082 04|a304.6|223
090 |aDK/12351
245 10|aPopulation Change and Rural Society|h[electronic resource] /|cedited by William A. Kandel, David L. Brown.
250 |a1st ed. 2006.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2006.
300 |aXIX, 467 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aThe Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis,|x2215-1990 ;|v16
505 0 |aand Demographic Context -- Rural America through a Demographic Lens -- The Rural Rebound and its Aftermath -- Four Critical Socio-Demographic Themes -- The Changing Faces of Rural America -- Changing Livelihoods in Rural America -- Fifty Years of Farmland Change -- Changing Fortunes -- Case Studies of Population and Society in Different Rural Regions -- Rural Hispanic Population Growth -- Social Integration Among Older in-Migrants in Nonmetropolitan Retirement Destination Counties -- Agricultural Dependence and Changing Population in the Great Plains -- Gaming, Population Change, and Rural Development on Indian Reservations -- Metro Expansion and Nonmetro Change in the South -- Changing Land Use in the Rural Intermountain West -- Does Second Home Development Adversely Affect Rural Life? -- Housing Affordability and Population Chang in the Upper Midwestern North Woods -- Social Change and Well-Being in Western Amenity-Growth Communities -- Community Evaluation and Migration Intentions -- Poverty and Income Inequality in Appalachia -- Welfare Reform Amidst Chronic Poverty in the Mississippi Delta -- New Analytic Directions and Policy Implications -- Explorations in Spatial Demography -- Policy Implications of Rural Demographic Change.
520 |aCALVIN L. BEALE In considering how to introduce the subject of rural population change in st the 21 Century, I ?nd myself re?ecting on my own experience as a demographer for the U. S. Department of Agriculture. When I arrived at the Department, the post-World War II modernization of farming was well under way. Each year, my colleague Gladys Bowles and I had the unpopular task of announcing how much the farm population had decreased in the prior year. It was hard to say that the phenomenon was someone’s fault. Dramatic reductions in labor requirements per unit of agricultural output were occurring everywhere and not just in the United States. But politically, blame had to be assigned, and whichever political party was not in the White House was certain to place the blame squarely on the current administration. The demographic consequences of this trend were major. In a 22-year period from 1941 to 1962, the net loss of farm population from migration and cessation of farming averaged over a million people per year. It took eight years after the war before an administration was willing to begin to talk about the need to diversify rural employment. By that time, farm residents had already become a minority of rural people. However, well into the 1970s, I continued to receive inquiries from people who still equated rural with farm or who could not envision what rural-nonfarm people did for a living.
650 0|aDemography.
650 0|aPopulation.
650 0|aSociology.
650 0|aRegional economics.
650 0|aSpatial economics.
650 0|aEconomic geography.
650 0|aHuman geography.
650 14|aPopulation and Demography.
650 24|aSociology.
650 24|aRegional and Spatial Economics.
650 24|aEconomic Geography.
650 24|aHuman Geography.
700 1 |aKandel, William A.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aBrown, David L.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402039119
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402039010
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048105168
830 0|aThe Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis,|x2215-1990 ;|v16
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3902-6
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXS
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aSocial Sciences (R0) (SpringerNature-43726)
Materyaller
Depodan talep edilen materyal sadece kütüphane içerisinde kullanılmaktadır.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
