LEADER 04081nam a22005415i 4500
001 811191
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131011917
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2007 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9781402055584|9978-1-4020-5558-4
024 7 |a10.1007/978-1-4020-5558-4|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aBD418-418.84
072 7|aHPM|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI015000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQDTM|2thema
082 04|a128.2|223
090 |aDK/12455
245 10|aFolk Psychology Re-Assessed|h[electronic resource] /|cedited by D. Hutto, Matthew M. Ratcliffe.
250 |a1st ed. 2007.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2007.
300 |aVIII, 254 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aEmotion, Perception, and Interaction -- Expression and Empathy -- We Share, Therefore We Think -- Logical and Phenomenological Arguments Against Simulation Theory -- Persons, Pronouns, and Perspectives -- Reasons, Norms, Narratives and Institutions -- There are Reasons and Reasons -- Folk Psychology Without Theory or Simulation -- The Regulative Dimension of Folk Psychology -- Folk Psychology: Science and Morals -- Folk Psychology and Freedom of the Will -- The Fragmentation of Folk Psychology -- Critter Psychology: On the Possibility of Nonhuman Animal Folk Psychology -- Folk Psychology Does not Exist -- From Folk Psychology to Commonsense.
520 |a1.1. FOLK PSYCHOLOGY, THEORY OF MIND AND SIMULATION The tasks we face in our day to day social lives are quite heterogeneous but many of them make a common demand upon us. They require us to understand and interact with other people and, in most social encounters, we exhibit a special sensitivity to our fellow human beings that is quite different from the way we respond to inanimate objects and most other species of organism. Social life is dependent, to a considerable degree, on our ability to understand what is distinctive about human behaviour and to successfully apply that understanding in all manner of situations. What is central to our ability to interpret one another? A great deal of work in philosophy of mind, cognitive science, anthropology, developmental psychology and a host of other disciplines assumes that, at root, interpersonal interpretation is accomplished through the employment of a ‘commonsense’ or ‘folk’ psychology, meaning an ‘everyday’, rather than ‘scientific’, appreciation of mindedness. Although there is considerable debate over which cognitive processes support our folk psychological abilities and how those abilities develop during childhood, there is a remarkable degree of consensus concerning what folk psychology consists of. Almost all discussions of the topic begin by stating or presupposing that it is the ability to attribute intentional states, principally beliefs and desires, to other people and perhaps also to oneself, in order to predict and explain behaviour.
650 0|aPhilosophy of mind.
650 0|aDevelopmental psychology.
650 0|aPhenomenology .
650 0|aPersonality.
650 0|aDifference (Psychology).
650 14|aPhilosophy of Mind.
650 24|aDevelopmental Psychology.
650 24|aPhenomenology.
650 24|aPersonality and Differential Psychology.
700 1 |aHutto, D.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aRatcliffe, Matthew M.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402055577
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048111503
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048173938
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5558-4
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)