LEADER 03488nam a22005655i 4500
001 811573
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131005247
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2009 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9781402099601|9978-1-4020-9960-1
024 7 |a10.1007/978-1-4020-9960-1|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aHB848-3697
072 7|aJHBD|2bicssc
072 7|aSOC006000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJHBD|2thema
082 04|a304.6|223
090 |aDK/12832
100 1 |aCharbit, Yves.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aEconomic, Social and Demographic Thought in the XIXth Century|h[electronic resource] :|bThe Population Debate from Malthus to Marx /|cby Yves Charbit.
250 |a1st ed. 2009.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2009.
300 |aX, 190 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aThe Population Controversy and Beyond -- Population, Economic Growth and Religion: Malthus as a Populationist -- From Malthusianism to Populationism: The French Liberal Economists (1840–1870) -- The Malthusian Trap: The Failure of Proudhon -- Capitalism and Population: Marx and Engels Against Malthus -- Beneath Demographic Issues.
520 |aAccording to current understanding, Malthus was hostile to an excess of population because it caused social sufferings, while Marx was favourable to demographic growth in so far as a large proletariat was a factor aggravating the contradictions of capitalism. This is unfortunately an oversimplification. Both raised the same crucial question: when considered as an economic variable, how does population fit into the analysis of economic growth? Even though they started from the same analytical standpoint, Marx established a very different diagnosis from that of Malthus and built a social doctrine no less divergent. The book also discusses the theoretical and doctrinal contribution of the liberal economists, writing at the onset of the industrial revolution in France (1840-1870), and those of their contemporary, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, who shared with Marx the denunciation of the capitalist system. By paying careful attention to the social, economic, and political context, this book goes beyond the shortcomings of the classification between pro- and anti-populationism. It sheds new light over nineteenth century controversies over population in France, a case study for Europe.
650 0|aDemography.
650 0|aPopulation.
650 0|aBusiness.
650 0|aManagement science.
650 0|aPopulation|xEconomic aspects.
650 0|aEconomics|xHistory.
650 0|aSociology|xMethodology.
650 14|aPopulation and Demography.
650 24|aBusiness and Management.
650 24|aPopulation Economics.
650 24|aHistory of Economic Thought and Methodology.
650 24|aSociological Methods.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402099595
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048127542
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048182299
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9960-1
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXS
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aSocial Sciences (R0) (SpringerNature-43726)