Thomas Jefferson and his Decimals 1775–1810: Neglected Years in the History of U.S. School Mathematics [electronic resource] / by M.A. (Ken) Clements, Nerida F. Ellerton.
Erişim Adresi
ISBN
9783319025056
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/12976
Yazar
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 2015.
Yayın Bilgisi
Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2015.
Fiziksel Niteleme
XX, 204 p. 45 illus., 38 illus. in color. online resource.
İçindekiler Notu
Early Moves Toward Metrication in Europe -- Measurement Chaos in North America, 1780–1980 -- Opportunity Lost: Big Money Successfully Thwarts Thomas Jefferson’s Push for Metrication 1776–1793 -- Muddling Along: Opposition to Moves for Metrication, 1793–1920 -- David Eugene Smith’s Involvement in the Metrication Issue, 1920–1935 -- The Decision for Metrication, 1970 -- Reaganomics, Big Money, and the Crushing of the Metric Dream, 1970-1980 -- Why has the United States Never Achieved Metrication?.
Özet, vb.
This well-illustrated book, by two established historians of school mathematics, documents Thomas Jefferson’s quest, after 1775, to introduce a form of decimal currency to the fledgling United States of America. The book describes a remarkable study showing how the United States’ decision to adopt a fully decimalized, carefully conceived national currency ultimately had a profound effect on U.S. school mathematics curricula. The book shows, by analyzing a large set of arithmetic textbooks and an even larger set of handwritten cyphering books, that although most eighteenth- and nineteenth-century authors of arithmetic textbooks included sections on vulgar and decimal fractions, most school students who prepared cyphering books did not study either vulgar or decimal fractions. In other words, author-intended school arithmetic curricula were not matched by teacher-implemented school arithmetic curricula. Amazingly, that state of affairs continued even after the U.S. Mint began minting dollars, cents and dimes in the 1790s. In U.S. schools between 1775 and 1810 it was often the case that Federal money was studied but decimal fractions were not. That gradually changed during the first century of the formal existence of the United States of America. By contrast, Chapter 6 reports a comparative analysis of data showing that in Great Britain only a minority of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century school students studied decimal fractions. Clements and Ellerton argue that Jefferson’s success in establishing a system of decimalized Federal money had educationally significant effects on implemented school arithmetic curricula in the United States of America. The lens through which Clements and Ellerton have analyzed their large data sets has been the lag-time theoretical position which they have developed. That theory posits that the time between when an important mathematical “discovery” is made (or a concept is“created”) and when that discovery (or concept) becomes an important part of school mathematics is dependent on mathematical, social, political and economic factors. Thus, lag time varies from region to region, and from nation to nation. Clements and Ellerton are the first to identify the years after 1775 as the dawn of a new day in U.S. school mathematics—traditionally, historians have argued that nothing in U.S. school mathematics was worthy of serious study until the 1820s. This book emphasizes the importance of the acceptance of decimal currency so far as school mathematics is concerned. It also draws attention to the consequences for school mathematics of the conscious decision of the U.S. Congress not to proceed with Thomas Jefferson’s grand scheme for a system of decimalized weights and measures. .
Konu
Mathematics __ Study and teaching .
Measure theory.
Mathematics Education.
Measure and Integration.
Measure theory.
Mathematics Education.
Measure and Integration.
Diğer Yazarlar
Kurum Adı
Eseri Alıntıla
Referansları kullanmadan önce gözden geçirmeniz ve varsa gerekli düzeltmeleri yapmanız önerilir.
Dijital Kaynak
MARC Görünümü
LEADER 05157nam a22005055i 4500
001 811718
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131004752
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 141119s2015 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783319025056|9978-3-319-02505-6
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-319-02505-6|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aQA10.92-20
072 7|aJNU|2bicssc
072 7|aPB|2bicssc
072 7|aEDU029010|2bisacsh
072 7|aJNU|2thema
072 7|aPB|2thema
082 04|a510.71|223
090 |aDK/12976
100 1 |aClements, M.A. (Ken).|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aThomas Jefferson and his Decimals 1775–1810: Neglected Years in the History of U.S. School Mathematics|h[electronic resource] /|cby M.A. (Ken) Clements, Nerida F. Ellerton.
250 |a1st ed. 2015.
264 1|aCham :|bSpringer International Publishing :|bImprint: Springer,|c2015.
300 |aXX, 204 p. 45 illus., 38 illus. in color.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aEarly Moves Toward Metrication in Europe -- Measurement Chaos in North America, 1780–1980 -- Opportunity Lost: Big Money Successfully Thwarts Thomas Jefferson’s Push for Metrication 1776–1793 -- Muddling Along: Opposition to Moves for Metrication, 1793–1920 -- David Eugene Smith’s Involvement in the Metrication Issue, 1920–1935 -- The Decision for Metrication, 1970 -- Reaganomics, Big Money, and the Crushing of the Metric Dream, 1970-1980 -- Why has the United States Never Achieved Metrication?.
520 |aThis well-illustrated book, by two established historians of school mathematics, documents Thomas Jefferson’s quest, after 1775, to introduce a form of decimal currency to the fledgling United States of America. The book describes a remarkable study showing how the United States’ decision to adopt a fully decimalized, carefully conceived national currency ultimately had a profound effect on U.S. school mathematics curricula. The book shows, by analyzing a large set of arithmetic textbooks and an even larger set of handwritten cyphering books, that although most eighteenth- and nineteenth-century authors of arithmetic textbooks included sections on vulgar and decimal fractions, most school students who prepared cyphering books did not study either vulgar or decimal fractions. In other words, author-intended school arithmetic curricula were not matched by teacher-implemented school arithmetic curricula. Amazingly, that state of affairs continued even after the U.S. Mint began minting dollars, cents and dimes in the 1790s. In U.S. schools between 1775 and 1810 it was often the case that Federal money was studied but decimal fractions were not. That gradually changed during the first century of the formal existence of the United States of America. By contrast, Chapter 6 reports a comparative analysis of data showing that in Great Britain only a minority of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century school students studied decimal fractions. Clements and Ellerton argue that Jefferson’s success in establishing a system of decimalized Federal money had educationally significant effects on implemented school arithmetic curricula in the United States of America. The lens through which Clements and Ellerton have analyzed their large data sets has been the lag-time theoretical position which they have developed. That theory posits that the time between when an important mathematical “discovery” is made (or a concept is“created”) and when that discovery (or concept) becomes an important part of school mathematics is dependent on mathematical, social, political and economic factors. Thus, lag time varies from region to region, and from nation to nation. Clements and Ellerton are the first to identify the years after 1775 as the dawn of a new day in U.S. school mathematics—traditionally, historians have argued that nothing in U.S. school mathematics was worthy of serious study until the 1820s. This book emphasizes the importance of the acceptance of decimal currency so far as school mathematics is concerned. It also draws attention to the consequences for school mathematics of the conscious decision of the U.S. Congress not to proceed with Thomas Jefferson’s grand scheme for a system of decimalized weights and measures. .
650 0|aMathematics|xStudy and teaching .
650 0|aMeasure theory.
650 14|aMathematics Education.
650 24|aMeasure and Integration.
700 1 |aEllerton, Nerida F.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319025049
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319025063
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319347103
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02505-6
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXED
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aEducation (R0) (SpringerNature-43721)
001 811718
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131004752
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 141119s2015 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783319025056|9978-3-319-02505-6
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-319-02505-6|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aQA10.92-20
072 7|aJNU|2bicssc
072 7|aPB|2bicssc
072 7|aEDU029010|2bisacsh
072 7|aJNU|2thema
072 7|aPB|2thema
082 04|a510.71|223
090 |aDK/12976
100 1 |aClements, M.A. (Ken).|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aThomas Jefferson and his Decimals 1775–1810: Neglected Years in the History of U.S. School Mathematics|h[electronic resource] /|cby M.A. (Ken) Clements, Nerida F. Ellerton.
250 |a1st ed. 2015.
264 1|aCham :|bSpringer International Publishing :|bImprint: Springer,|c2015.
300 |aXX, 204 p. 45 illus., 38 illus. in color.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aEarly Moves Toward Metrication in Europe -- Measurement Chaos in North America, 1780–1980 -- Opportunity Lost: Big Money Successfully Thwarts Thomas Jefferson’s Push for Metrication 1776–1793 -- Muddling Along: Opposition to Moves for Metrication, 1793–1920 -- David Eugene Smith’s Involvement in the Metrication Issue, 1920–1935 -- The Decision for Metrication, 1970 -- Reaganomics, Big Money, and the Crushing of the Metric Dream, 1970-1980 -- Why has the United States Never Achieved Metrication?.
520 |aThis well-illustrated book, by two established historians of school mathematics, documents Thomas Jefferson’s quest, after 1775, to introduce a form of decimal currency to the fledgling United States of America. The book describes a remarkable study showing how the United States’ decision to adopt a fully decimalized, carefully conceived national currency ultimately had a profound effect on U.S. school mathematics curricula. The book shows, by analyzing a large set of arithmetic textbooks and an even larger set of handwritten cyphering books, that although most eighteenth- and nineteenth-century authors of arithmetic textbooks included sections on vulgar and decimal fractions, most school students who prepared cyphering books did not study either vulgar or decimal fractions. In other words, author-intended school arithmetic curricula were not matched by teacher-implemented school arithmetic curricula. Amazingly, that state of affairs continued even after the U.S. Mint began minting dollars, cents and dimes in the 1790s. In U.S. schools between 1775 and 1810 it was often the case that Federal money was studied but decimal fractions were not. That gradually changed during the first century of the formal existence of the United States of America. By contrast, Chapter 6 reports a comparative analysis of data showing that in Great Britain only a minority of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century school students studied decimal fractions. Clements and Ellerton argue that Jefferson’s success in establishing a system of decimalized Federal money had educationally significant effects on implemented school arithmetic curricula in the United States of America. The lens through which Clements and Ellerton have analyzed their large data sets has been the lag-time theoretical position which they have developed. That theory posits that the time between when an important mathematical “discovery” is made (or a concept is“created”) and when that discovery (or concept) becomes an important part of school mathematics is dependent on mathematical, social, political and economic factors. Thus, lag time varies from region to region, and from nation to nation. Clements and Ellerton are the first to identify the years after 1775 as the dawn of a new day in U.S. school mathematics—traditionally, historians have argued that nothing in U.S. school mathematics was worthy of serious study until the 1820s. This book emphasizes the importance of the acceptance of decimal currency so far as school mathematics is concerned. It also draws attention to the consequences for school mathematics of the conscious decision of the U.S. Congress not to proceed with Thomas Jefferson’s grand scheme for a system of decimalized weights and measures. .
650 0|aMathematics|xStudy and teaching .
650 0|aMeasure theory.
650 14|aMathematics Education.
650 24|aMeasure and Integration.
700 1 |aEllerton, Nerida F.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319025049
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319025063
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319347103
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02505-6
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXED
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aEducation (R0) (SpringerNature-43721)
Materyaller
Depodan talep edilen materyal sadece kütüphane içerisinde kullanılmaktadır.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
