LEADER 04312nam a22005535i 4500
001 811781
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131004620
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1991 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401133807|9978-94-011-3380-7
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-011-3380-7|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aBJ1-1725
072 7|aHPQ|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI005000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQDTQ|2thema
082 04|a170|223
090 |aDK/13039
100 1 |aKing, N.M.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aMaking Sense of Advance Directives|h[electronic resource] /|cby N.M. King.
250 |a1st ed. 1991.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1991.
300 |aX, 215 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aClinical Medical Ethics ;|v2
505 0 |aOne: Introduction -- Two: Treatment Refusal and the Patient’s Choice: Foundations in History, Law, and Ethics -- Three: The “Future Factor”: Conceptual Foundations of Advance Directives -- Four: Advance Directives: Current Forms, Legal Fears, Moral Goals -- Five: When Choices Fail -- Six: The Forecast for Advance Directives: Indispensable or Superfluous? -- Bibliography: Books and Articles -- Bibliography: Cases and Statutes -- Appendix: Advance Directive Statutes, State-by-State Listing.
520 |aThe first time I read the medical consent and authorization. it had registered in my mind simply as a legal document. Now I began to understand what it meant. It was a letter of ultimate love and trust. (Schucking. 1985. p. 268) Ever since Karen Ann Quinlan slipped into permanent unconsciousness in 1975 and her father agonized publicly over whether she should remain indefinitely on a respirator (In re Quinlan, 1976), the desires of patients, their families, and their friends to limit the application of apparently limitless medical technology have been a pressing concern for ethics, law, and public policy. Ms. Quinlan's case contained nearly all the elements of the problems we still face: vague, general, but sincere prior oral statements suggesting that she would not want continued treatment; a family attempting to do what they saw as best for her; and physicians uncertain whether to use medical judgment alone (and if so, what the "right" medical decision was), to preserve her life at all costs, or to honor the family's interpretation of their daughter's choice. Most ironically, once she was removed from her respirator, she did not die. Karen Quinlan - like dozens of other names made famous by court decisions, newspaper stories, and television evening news - has come to symbolize a tangled knot of issues surrounding the end of life and who controls it.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aEthics.
650 0|aNeurosciences.
650 14|aMoral Philosophy and Applied Ethics.
650 24|aNeuroscience.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780792311638
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401133814
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401054959
830 0|aClinical Medical Ethics ;|v2
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3380-7
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)