LEADER 03893nam a22006015i 4500
001 811860
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131004350
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 130526s2002 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401710091|9978-94-017-1009-1
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-017-1009-1|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aBD143-237
072 7|aHPK|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI004000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQDTK|2thema
082 04|a120|223
090 |aDK/13118
245 10|aCeterus Paribus Laws|h[electronic resource] /|cedited by John Earman, Clark Glymour, Sandra Mitchell.
250 |a1st ed. 2002.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2002.
300 |aIII, 174 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aCeteris Paribus Lost -- There Is No Such Thing as a CeterisParibus Law -- Ceteris Paribus — An Inadequate Representation for Biological Contingency -- Ceteris Paribus Laws: Classification and Deconstruction -- Laws, Ceteris Paribus Conditions, and the Dynamics of Belief -- A Semantics and Methodology for Ceteris Paribus Hypothesis -- Who’s Afraid of Ceteris-Paribus Laws? Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Them -- In Favor of Laws that Are Not Ceteris Paribus After All -- Cartwright on Explanation and Idealization.
520 |aNatural and social sciences seem very often, though usually only implicitly, to hedge their laws by ceteris paribus clauses - a practice which is philosophically very hard to understand because such clauses seem to render the laws trivial and unfalsifiable. After early worries the issue is vigorously discussed in the philosophy of science and the philosophy of mind since ca. 15 years. This volume collects the most prominent philosophers of science in the field and presents a lively, controversial, but well-integrated, highly original and up-to-date discussion of the issue. It will be the reference book in the coming years concerning ceteris paribus laws.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aKnowledge, Theory of.
650 0|aMetaphysics.
650 0|aPhilosophy of mind.
650 0|aScience|xPhilosophy.
650 14|aEpistemology.
650 24|aMetaphysics.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Mind.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Science.
700 1 |aEarman, John.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aGlymour, Clark.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aMitchell, Sandra.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781402010200
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048161737
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401710107
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1009-1
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)