LEADER 03672nam a22005175i 4500
001 812045
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131003657
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 140703s2014 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783642552656|9978-3-642-55265-6
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-642-55265-6|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aK4240-4343
072 7|aLNJ|2bicssc
072 7|aLAW000000|2bisacsh
072 7|aLNJ|2thema
082 04|a343.099|223
090 |aDK/13302
100 1 |aGuan, Wenwei.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aIntellectual Property Theory and Practice|h[electronic resource] :|bA Critical Examination of China’s TRIPS Compliance and Beyond /|cby Wenwei Guan.
250 |a1st ed. 2014.
264 1|aBerlin, Heidelberg :|bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg :|bImprint: Springer,|c2014.
300 |aXI, 168 p. 5 illus.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aIntellectual Property: Concept, History, and Contentions -- Private-Public Dynamics: the Paradox of Intellectual Property Philosophy.- Public-Private Dynamics in China’s IP Regime and TRIPS Compliance -- IP Perceptions Survey: the Dynamics in Reality -- TRIPS’ Legitimacy Deficit and the Myth of Modern law -- Conclusion: Ontology, Legitimacy, and Time.
520 |aThis book explains China’s intellectual property perspective in the context of European theories, through a critical examination of intellectual property theory and practice focused on China’s compliance with the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). The author’s critical review of contemporary intellectual property philosophy suggests that justifying intellectual property protection through Locke or Hegel’s property theories internalizes a theoretical paradox. “Professor Wenwei Guan’s treatment of intellectual property law and practice in the PRC offers new perspectives that enrich an already active field of study . . . This book will be a useful contribution to academic and policy discourses examining conceptual and operational dimensions of China’s intellectual property protection system and the broader process of China’s international engagement.” – Dr. Pitman B. Potter, Professor of Law, University of British Columbia, Canada “Dr. Guan reminds us of the daunting challenge of the public-private divide in forming and reforming TRIPS regime; how this regime has failed to address development needs and public concerns in developing countries like China; and how TRIPS’s ‘birth defect’ can be overcome and its evolution can be put back on the right track.” – Dr. Yahong Li, Associate Professor at Faculty of Law, Hong Kong University.
650 0|aInformation technology|xLaw and legislation.
650 0|aMass media|xLaw and legislation.
650 0|aLaw|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aLaw|xHistory.
650 0|aRetail trade.
650 14|aIT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property.
650 24|aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
650 24|aTrade and Retail.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783642552649
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783642552663
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783662514450
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55265-6
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXLC
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aLaw and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)