LEADER 04390nam a22006015i 4500
001 812132
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131002047
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1988 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789400930674|9978-94-009-3067-4
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-009-3067-4|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aLB1-3640
050 4|aB63
072 7|aJNA|2bicssc
072 7|aEDU040000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJNA|2thema
082 04|a370.1|223
090 |aDK/13389
100 1 |aMacmillan, C.J.B.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 12|aA Logical Theory of Teaching|h[electronic resource] :|bErotetics and Intentionality /|cby C.J.B. Macmillan, James W. Garrison.
250 |a1st ed. 1988.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1988.
300 |aX, 244 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aPhilosophy and Education ;|v1
505 0 |aI. Introduction: The Intentionalist Manifesto -- II. An Erotetic Concept of Teaching -- III. A Philosophical Critique of Process-Product Research in Teaching -- IV. Erotetic Logic and Teaching -- V. Erotetic Causation -- VI. Erotetic Teaching Strategies -- VII. Socratic and Erotetic Teaching -- VIII. Teachers’ Questions -- IX. Erotetics, Cognitive Psychology and the Process of Problem Solving -- X. Erotetic Prospects -- References -- Index Of Names -- Index Of Topics.
520 |ahappens, how it happens, and why it happens. Our assumption ought to be that this is as true in education as it is in atomic physics. But this leaves many other questions to answer. The crucial ones: What kind of science is proper or appropriate to education? How does it differ from physics? What is wrong with the prevai1~ ing, virtually unopposed research tradition in education? What could or should be done to replace it with a more adequate tradi tion? What concepts are necessary to describe and explain what we find there? It is in this realm that we find ourselves. Where to start? One place - our place, needless to say - is with one limited but central concept in education, teaching. A long philosophical tradition concerned with the nature of teaching goes back (along with everything else) to Plato, divulging most recent ly in the work of such philosophers as B. O. Smith, Scheffler, Hirst, Komisar, Green, McClellan, Soltis, Kerr, Fenstermacher, et al. An empirical tradition runs parallelto the philosophers -it has its most notable modern proponents in Gage, the Soars, Berliner, Rosen shine, but its roots can be traced to the Sophists. These two tradi tions have been at loggerheads over the centuries.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aEducation|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aScience|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aEducation.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Education.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Science.
650 24|aEducation.
700 1 |aGarrison, James W.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789027728135
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400930681
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401078795
830 0|aPhilosophy and Education ;|v1
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3067-4
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)