LEADER 04160nam a22005055i 4500
001 812235
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131001040
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1971 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401197113|9978-94-011-9711-3
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-011-9711-3|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aGN
072 7|aJHM|2bicssc
072 7|aSOC002000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJHM|2thema
082 04|a301|223
090 |aDK/13490
100 1 |aClark, M.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aLogic and System|h[electronic resource] :|bA Study of the Transition from “Vorstellung” to Thought in the Philosophy of Hegel /|cby M. Clark.
250 |a1st ed. 1971.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1971.
300 |aXIII, 213 p. 3 illus., 2 illus. in color.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |a1. Three contemporary studies of Hegel -- 2. The situation of this study -- I “Vorstellung” and Thought -- I The Description of Vorstellung -- II The Place of Vorstellung in the Philosophy of Spirit -- III The Logic of Essence -- II Logic and System -- IV Development toward System -- V The System in the Element of Vorstellung -- VI The System in the Element of Thought: Conclusion.
520 |aThis book will examine one of the oldest problems in understanding what Hegel was trying to do. What is the place ofthe Logic in the Hegelian system? That is, how did Hegel see the relation between "pure thought" and its origins or applications in our many forms of experience? A novel approach to this old question has been adopted. This book will study Hegers account of what he regarded as the dosest "illustrations" of pure thinking, namely the way we find our thought in language and the way philosophieal truths are expressed in religious talk. The preface will indicate the problem and the approach. The introduction will examine three recent works on Hegel and suggest how they invite the sort of study which is pro posedhere. of all wisdom, a time There was a time when Hegel was read as the source also when he was treated only as an occasion of ridicule. Both are now past. The attitude of metaphysicians is more cautious, that oftheir opponents more receptive. Each side is better prepared to allow those who hold an assured place in the history of philosophy to speak for themselves and reveal their achievements and their limits. In this atmosphere there is special reason, on both sides, for the study of Hege!. No one has made such extreme claims for metaphysical thought and developed it so extensively and systematieally. No one has demanded more from posterity in the criticism of such thought.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aAnthropology.
650 14|aAnthropology.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789024751105
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401197120
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401197137
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9711-3
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXS
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aSocial Sciences (R0) (SpringerNature-43726)