LEADER 03466nam a22005535i 4500
001 812338
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260128004825
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 110326s2011 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789400711952|9978-94-007-1195-2
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-007-1195-2|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aHB848-3697
072 7|aJHBD|2bicssc
072 7|aSOC006000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJHBD|2thema
082 04|a304.6|223
100 1 |aSwanson, David A.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aCEMAF as a Census Method|h[electronic resource] :|bA Proposal for a Re-Designed Census and An Independent U.S. Census Bureau /|cby David A. Swanson, Paula J. Walashek.
250 |a1st ed. 2011.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2011.
300 |aVI, 46 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aSpringerBriefs in Population Studies,|x2211-3223
505 0 |aI: Introduction -- II: The Four Principles -- III: CEMAF -- IV: Constitutional and Legal Issues Facing CEMAF -- V: Summary.
520 |aIn  provocative terms that  push the envelope of technical, administrative, and legal capabilities, Swanson and Walashek  propose a re-vamped US census  based neither on the current system, self-enumeration, nor its predecessor, door-to-door canvassing.  Instead, they propose that it be built on a combination of four elements: (1) administrative records; (2) the continuously updated Master Address File; (3) survey data; and (4) modeling and imputation techniques.  They use “Census-Enhanced Master Address File (CEMAF) as a descriptive term for their proposal, which is based on four principles and includes a proposal for an independent Census Bureau.   They argue that evidence suggests that the methods used to conduct traditional census counts may be at the end of their useful working lives, as evidenced by increasing costs and declining response rates. Some of their ideas will seem farfetched. However, Swanson and Walashek believe this is the time to discuss radical proposals as governments re-examine the utility of traditional census counts and consider reductions, as is the case in Canada and England.   This SpringerBriefs should be on the reading list of staff in statistical agencies grappling with rising costs and declining response rates, as well as census stakeholders concerned about costs, accuracy, and census utility.
650 0|aDemography.
650 0|aPopulation.
650 0|aStatistics .
650 0|aConstitutional law.
650 0|aSocial policy.
650 14|aPopulation and Demography.
650 24|aStatistics.
650 24|aConstitutional Law.
650 24|aSocial Policy.
700 1 |aWalashek, Paula J.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400711945
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400711969
830 0|aSpringerBriefs in Population Studies,|x2211-3223
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1195-2
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXS
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aSocial Sciences (R0) (SpringerNature-43726)