LEADER 03351nam a22005415i 4500
001 812686
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130233347
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 131123s2014 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783319017990|9978-3-319-01799-0
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-319-01799-0|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aBC1-199
072 7|aHPL|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI011000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQDTL|2thema
082 04|a160|223
090 |aDK/13932
100 1 |aTahin, Gábor.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aHeuristic Strategies in the Speeches of Cicero|h[electronic resource] /|cby Gábor Tahin.
250 |a1st ed. 2014.
264 1|aCham :|bSpringer International Publishing :|bImprint: Springer,|c2014.
300 |aXVI, 193 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aArgumentation Library,|x2215-1907 ;|v23
505 0 |aForeword -- Acknowledgement -- Table of Contents -- Preface.- Chapter 1 Introduction: The Problem of Analysis -- Chapter 3 The Origins of Heuristic Argumentation: Probable Arguments in Ancient Rhetoric -- Chapter 4 Cicero’s Models: Heuristic Arguments in the Greek Orators -- Chapter 5 Pro Flacco -- Chapter 6  Pro Sulla.- Chapter 7 Pro Murena.- Chapter 8 Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino -- Chapter 9 Pro Milone -- Chapter 10 Pro Cluentio -- Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Index.
520 |aThis book introduces a new form of argumentative analysis: rhetorical heuremes. The method applies the concepts of heuristic thinking, probability, and contingency in order to develop a better understanding of complex arguments in classical oratory. A new theory is required because Greek and Roman rhetoric cannot provide detailed answers to problems of strategic argumentation in the analysis of speeches. Building on scholarship in Ciceronian oratory, this book moves beyond the extant terminology and employs a concept of heuristic reasoning derived from the psychology of decision making and mathematical problem solving. The author analyses selected passages from Cicero’s forensic speeches where arguments of probability are deployed, and shows that the Sophistic concept of probability can link ancient rhetoric and modern theories of argumentation. Six groups of heuremes are identified, each of which represents a form of probabilistic reasoning by which the orator plays upon the perception of the jurors.
650 0|aLogic.
650 0|aHistory, Ancient.
650 0|aHistorical linguistics.
650 0|aPhilosophy, Ancient.
650 14|aLogic.
650 24|aClassical Studies.
650 24|aHistorical Linguistics.
650 24|aAncient Philosophy / Classical Philosophy.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319017983
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319018003
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319347691
830 0|aArgumentation Library,|x2215-1907 ;|v23
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01799-0
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)