LEADER 03936nam a22005175i 4500
001 812811
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130232813
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1966 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401509398|9978-94-015-0939-8
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-015-0939-8|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aBL51
072 7|aHRAB|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI022000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQRAB|2thema
082 04|a210|223
090 |aDK/14056
100 1 |aSchmidt, Robert W.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 14|aThe Domain of Logic According to Saint Thomas Aquinas|h[electronic resource] /|cby Robert W. Schmidt.
250 |a1st ed. 1966.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1966.
300 |aXVIII, 352 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aI: The Specification of Logic as a Science -- I. Preliminary View of What Logic Is -- II. Relation of Logic to Other Sciences -- III. The Subject of Logic -- II: The Nature of the Subject of Logic -- IV. Rationate Being -- V. Intentions -- VI. Relations -- III: The Intentions of the three Acts of Reason -- VII. The Intention of Universality -- VIII. The Intention of Attribution -- IX. The Intention of Consequence -- Conclusion.
520 |aEver since philosophy became conscious of itself, there has been a problem of the relations between the real world which philosophy sought to understand and explain, and the thought by which it sought to explain it. It was found that thought had certain requirements and conditions of its own. If the real world was to be understood through thought, there was a question whether thought and the real correspond ed in all respects, and therefore whether they had the same conditions and laws, or whether some of these were peculiar to thought alone. For the solution of this problem it was necessary to study thought and the process of knowing and the conditions which the manner of know ing placed upon our interpretation of the real. With a consciousness of the peculiarities of thought and of its laws, philosophers could then more surely make use of it to arrive at the knowledge of the real world which they were seeking, without danger of reading into the real what is peculiar to thought. This necessity gave rise to the science of logic, a science which is still necessary, and for the same reasons. It has an importance in philosophy which it is disastrous to overlook.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aReligion|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aLogic.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Religion.
650 24|aLogic.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401503679
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401509404
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0939-8
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)