LEADER 04270nam a22005895i 4500
001 812930
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130232437
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s2001 xxu| s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9781441985620|9978-1-4419-8562-0
024 7 |a10.1007/978-1-4419-8562-0|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aQ174-175.3
050 4|aB67
072 7|aPDA|2bicssc
072 7|aSCI075000|2bisacsh
072 7|aPDA|2thema
082 04|a501|223
090 |aDK/14175
100 1 |aMagnani, L.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aAbduction, Reason and Science|h[electronic resource] :|bProcesses of Discovery and Explanation /|cby L. Magnani.
250 |a1st ed. 2001.
264 1|aNew York, NY :|bSpringer US :|bImprint: Springer,|c2001.
300 |aXVII, 205 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |a1 Hypothesis Generation -- 2 Theoretical Abduction -- 3 Manipulative Abduction -- 4 Diagnostic Reasoning -- 5 Visual and Temporal Abduction -- 6 Governing Inconsistencies -- 7 Hypothesis Withdrawal in Science -- References -- Author Index.
520 |aThis volume explores abduction (inference to explanatory hypotheses), an important but neglected topic in scientific reasoning. My aim is to inte grate philosophical, cognitive, and computational issues, while also discuss ing some cases of reasoning in science and medicine. The main thesis is that abduction is a significant kind of scientific reasoning, helpful in delineating the first principles of a new theory of science. The status of abduction is very controversial. When dealing with abduc tive reasoning misinterpretations and equivocations are common. What are the differences between abduction and induction? What are the differences between abduction and the well-known hypothetico-deductive method? What did Peirce mean when he considered abduction a kind of inference? Does abduction involve only the generation of hypotheses or their evaluation too? Are the criteria for the best explanation in abductive reasoning epis temic, or pragmatic, or both? How many kinds of abduction are there? The book aims to increase knowledge about creative and expert infer ences. The study of these high-level methods of abductive reasoning is situ ated at the crossroads of philosophy, epistemology, artificial intel1igence, cognitive psychology, and logic; that is, at the heart of cognitive science. Philosophers of science in the twentieth century have traditionally distin guished between the inferential processes active in the logic of discovery and the ones active in logic of justification.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aScience|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aLogic.
650 0|aCognitive psychology.
650 0|aHistory.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Science.
650 24|aLogic.
650 24|aCognitive Psychology.
650 24|aHistory.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780306465147
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781441985637
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781461346371
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8562-0
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
