LEADER 03797nam a22006255i 4500
001 812947
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130232404
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 140611s2014 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783642450884|9978-3-642-45088-4
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-642-45088-4|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aT14
072 7|aHP|2bicssc
072 7|aTB|2bicssc
072 7|aSCI075000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQD|2thema
072 7|aTB|2thema
082 04|a601|223
090 |aDK/14192
100 1 |aCotton, Matthew.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aEthics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach|h[electronic resource] /|cby Matthew Cotton.
250 |a1st ed. 2014.
264 1|aBerlin, Heidelberg :|bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg :|bImprint: Springer,|c2014.
300 |aXII, 172 p. 8 illus.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics,|x2192-6263 ;|v13
505 0 |aAcknowledgements -- List of abbreviations -- Risk and public involvement in technology governance -- Ethics and technology -- Pragmatism, public deliberation and technology ethics -- Ethical tools -- Reflective Ethical Mapping -- Opening up ethical dialogue -- Judging and deciding -- Conclusions.
520 |aWhether it is nuclear power, geo-engineering or genetically modified foods, the development of new technologies can be fraught with complex ethical challenges and political controversy which defy simple resolution. In the past two decades there has been a shift towards processes of Participatory Technology Assessment designed to build channels of two-way communication between technical specialists and non-expert citizens, and to incorporate multiple stakeholder perspectives in the governance of contentious technology programmes. This participatory turn has spurred a need for new tools and techniques to encourage group deliberation and capture public values, moral and choices.  This book specifically examines the ethical dimensions of controversial technologies, and discusses how these can be evaluated in a philosophically robust manner when the ones doing the deliberating are not ethicists, legal or technical experts. Grounded in philosophical pragmatism and drawing upon empirical work in partnership with citizen-stakeholders, this book presents a model called “Reflective Ethical Mapping” - a new meta-ethical framework and toolbox of techniques to facilitate citizen engagement with technology ethics.
650 0|aTechnology|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aIndustrial engineering.
650 0|aProduction engineering.
650 0|aEnvironmental economics.
650 0|aInternational economic relations.
650 0|aEthics.
650 0|aEnvironmental Law.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Technology.
650 24|aIndustrial and Production Engineering.
650 24|aEnvironmental Economics.
650 24|aInternational Political Economy’.
650 24|aMoral Philosophy and Applied Ethics.
650 24|aEnvironmental Law.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783642450877
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783642450891
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783662521670
830 0|aStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics,|x2192-6263 ;|v13
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45088-4
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)