LEADER 04148nam a22006015i 4500
001 813386
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130225754
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 130909s1982 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401744430|9978-94-017-4443-0
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-017-4443-0|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aK7000-7720.22
072 7|aLB|2bicssc
072 7|aLAM|2bicssc
072 7|aLAW051000|2bisacsh
072 7|aLB|2thema
072 7|aLAM|2thema
082 04|a340.9|223
090 |aDK/14628
245 10|aNetherlands Reports to the XIth International Congress of Comparative Law Caracas 1982|h[electronic resource] /|cedited by H. D'Oliveira.
250 |a1st ed. 1982.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1982.
300 |aIX, 446 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
520 |aLast year I addressed the Netherlands Comparative Law Asso ciation with the following question: 'Does Comparative Law Exist At All?' (My intention then was to flog the dead (?) horse of the merger of comparative law and the sociology of law. ) In presenting this voluminous collection of Netherlands national reports to the eleventh congress of the Internatio nal Academy of Comparative Law I feel my misgivings giving way to the suspicion, that comparative law indeed exists. Of course national reports do not, as such, prove the exist ence of comparative law. It is the general reports together with the national reports, which embody the comparative effort. That is why the Netherlands Comparative Law Associa tion took the initiative to propose the publishing of the materials on a subject to subject basis instead of publish ing collections of national reports. From a comparative legal point of view, it is the topic that should form the basis of the publication, and not the origin of the materials. The general reporter for each topic should be prepared to take up the responsabilities of editing the volume, and would have to be given the right to select those national reports which he considers to be useful both in regard to their quality and the relevance of the material to the basic problems in the questionnaire. This proposal met with very favourable comments from the na tional committees and general reporters of some fifteen coun tries.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aPrivate international law.
650 0|aConflict of laws.
650 0|aInternational law.
650 0|aComparative law.
650 0|aLaw|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aLaw|xHistory.
650 0|aLaw.
650 14|aPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
650 24|aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
650 24|aLaw.
700 1 |aD'Oliveira, H.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789065440730
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401744447
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4443-0
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXLC
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aLaw and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)