LEADER 04207nam a22005775i 4500
001 813752
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260127135827
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 130413s1998 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401589925|9978-94-015-8992-5
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-015-8992-5|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aB1-5802
072 7|aHP|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI000000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQD|2thema
082 04|a100|223
100 1 |aRotenstreich, Nathan.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aSynthesis and Intentional Objectivity|h[electronic resource] :|bOn Kant and Husserl /|cby Nathan Rotenstreich.
250 |a1st ed. 1998.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1998.
300 |aVIII, 136 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aContributions to Phenomenology, In Cooperation with The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology,|x2215-1915 ;|v33
505 0 |aI: Sensuality and Ideation -- II: Conditions and Foundations -- III: From Ideation to Constitution -- IV: Fundamental Data and Their Exposition -- V: From Exposition to Phenomenological Insight -- VI: The Beginning and the Goal -- VII: Science and Philosophy -- Postscript.
520 |aWe shall be concemed in the following pages with some issues common to the systems of both Kant and Husserl. Given the structured nature of philosophical systems, however, the topics cannot be isolated from the systems in which they function, imbuing them in each case with a specific direction. An examination of the basic concept of Anschauung will indicate the difference between the two systems. To be sure, Anschauung points in both to the visual aspect of knowledge, an element inherent in the classical concept of theoria, which is related to the word horao, to see. In Kant, however, the visual aspect is not the highest component of cognition, since it is related to sensuality. Anschauung belongs to the synthesis and not the summit of knowledge. It is given before thinking, and is present in the ongoing search for relations between data. In Kant's understanding, pure reason can be related to data only through the medium of understanding. In this sense, we could say that Anschauung, being a variation of Schau, is that which can be perceived with the eyes. In Kant's system, it points to the presence of that which is given and thus to reception, whereas knowledge proper is a synthesis of reception and spontaneity .
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aPhilosophy.
650 0|aPhenomenology .
650 0|aOntology.
650 14|aPhilosophy.
650 24|aPhenomenology.
650 24|aOntology.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780792349563
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048149971
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401589932
830 0|aContributions to Phenomenology, In Cooperation with The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology,|x2215-1915 ;|v33
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8992-5
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)