LEADER 04190nam a22005775i 4500
001 813789
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130223249
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1995 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401101516|9978-94-011-0151-6
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-011-0151-6|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aB108-708
072 7|aHPCA|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI002000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQDHA|2thema
082 04|a180.0901|223
090 |aDK/15029
100 1 |aNails, Debra.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aAgora, Academy, and the Conduct of Philosophy|h[electronic resource] /|cby Debra Nails.
250 |a1st ed. 1995.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1995.
300 |aXIX, 267 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aPhilosophical Studies Series,|x2542-8349 ;|v63
505 0 |aI: A Metaphilosophical Task -- 1: Introduction -- 2: The Socratic Problem -- 3: The Platonic Question -- II: The Developmental Hypothesis -- 4: The Early Middle Late Consensus: How Deep? How Broad? -- 5: The Content of the Dialogues -- 6: Stylometric Investigations -- 7: Thesleff’s Philological Undermining of Developmentalism -- III: Havelock’s Hypothesis: Plato Overturns The Oral Tradition -- 8: Socrates Oralist, Plato Textualist -- 9: Literacy in Fifth Century Athens -- 10: The Anthropological Evidence and Where It Falls -- IV: The Conduct of Philosophy -- 11: Socrates in the Agora -- 12: Plato in the Academy -- Index of Passages -- General Index.
520 |aAgora, Academy, and the Conduct of Philosophy offers extremely careful and detailed criticisms of some of the most important assumptions scholars have brought to bear in beginning the process of (Platonic) interpretation. It goes on to offer a new way to group the dialogues, based on important facts in the lives and philosophical practices of Socrates - the main speaker in most of Plato's dialogues - and of Plato himself. Both sides of Debra Nails's arguments deserve close attention: the negative side, which exposes a great deal of diversity in a field that often claims to have achieved a consensus; and the positive side, which insists that we must attend to what we know of these philosophers' lives and practices, if we are to make a serious attempt to understand why Plato wrote the way he did, and why his writings seem to depict different philosophies and even different approaches to philosophizing. From the Preface by Nicholas D. Smith.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aPhilosophy, Ancient.
650 0|aHistory, Ancient.
650 0|aHistory.
650 14|aAncient Philosophy / Classical Philosophy.
650 24|aClassical Studies.
650 24|aHistory.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780792335436
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401101523
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401040686
830 0|aPhilosophical Studies Series,|x2542-8349 ;|v63
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0151-6
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)