Characterizing the Robustness of Science [electronic resource] : After the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science / edited by Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles, William Wimsatt.
Erişim Adresi
ISBN
9789400727595
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/15102
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 2012.
Yayın Bilgisi
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2012.
Fiziksel Niteleme
X, 374 p. online resource.
Dizi
Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, 2214-7942 ; 292
İçindekiler Notu
Introduction. The Solidity of Scientific Achievements: Structure of the Problem, Difficulties, Philosophical Implications -- Chapter 1. Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination (1981) -- Chapter 2. Robustness: Material, and Inferential, in the Natural and Human Sciences -- Chapter 3. Achieving Robustness to Confirm Controversial Hypotheses: A Case -- Study in Cell Biology -- Chapter 4. Multiple Derivability and the Reliability and Stabilization of theories -- Chapter 5. Robustness of an Experimental Result: The Example of the Tests of Bell’s Inequalities -- Chapter 6. Scientific Images and Robustness -- Chapter 7. Are we still Babylonians? The Structure of the Foundations of Mathematics from a Wimsattian Perspective Chapter 8. Rerum Concordia Discors: Robustness and Discordant Multimodal -- Evidence -- Chapter 9. Robustness of Results and Robustness of Derivations: the InternalArchitecture of a Solid Experimental Proof -- Chapter 10. Multiple Means of Determination and Multiple Constraints of Construction: Robustness and Strategies for Modeling Macromolecular Objects -- Chapter 11. Understanding Scientific Practices: The Role of Robustness-notions -- Chapter 12. The Robustness of Science and the Dance of Agency -- Chapter 13. Dynamic Robustness and Design in Nature and Artifact Chapter 12. The Robustness of Science and the Dance of Agency -- Chapter 13. Dynamic Robustness and Design in Nature and Artifact.
Özet, vb.
Mature sciences have been long been characterized in terms of the “successfulness”, “reliability” or “trustworthiness” of their theoretical, experimental or technical accomplishments. Today many philosophers of science talk of “robustness”, often without specifying in a precise way the meaning of this term. This lack of clarity is the cause of frequent misunderstandings, since all these notions, and that of robustness in particular, are connected to fundamental issues, which concern nothing less than the very nature of science and its specificity with respect to other human practices, the nature of rationality and of scientific progress; and science’s claim to be a truth-conducive activity. This book offers for the first time a comprehensive analysis of the problem of robustness, and in general, that of the reliability of science, based on several detailed case studies and on philosophical essays inspired by the so-called practical turn in philosophy of science. Thanks to its rich thematic variety, the book is addressed to the entire science studies community: general philosophers of science, philosophers of physics, biology, cognitive sciences, historians, sociologists and anthropologists of science. As the authors carefully explain all the examples discussed in the book, only a general background of scientific knowledge is presupposed.
Konu
Science __ Philosophy.
Science __ History.
Social sciences.
Humanities.
Technology __ Philosophy.
Biology __ Philosophy.
Philosophy of Science.
History of Science.
Humanities and Social Sciences.
Philosophy of Technology.
Philosophy of Biology.
Science __ History.
Social sciences.
Humanities.
Technology __ Philosophy.
Biology __ Philosophy.
Philosophy of Science.
History of Science.
Humanities and Social Sciences.
Philosophy of Technology.
Philosophy of Biology.
Kurum Adı
Eseri Alıntıla
Referansları kullanmadan önce gözden geçirmeniz ve varsa gerekli düzeltmeleri yapmanız önerilir.
Dijital Kaynak
MARC Görünümü
LEADER 05248nam a22006255i 4500
001 813862
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130222921
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 120321s2012 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789400727595|9978-94-007-2759-5
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-007-2759-5|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aQ174-175.3
050 4|aB67
072 7|aPDA|2bicssc
072 7|aSCI075000|2bisacsh
072 7|aPDA|2thema
082 04|a501|223
090 |aDK/15102
245 10|aCharacterizing the Robustness of Science|h[electronic resource] :|bAfter the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science /|cedited by Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles, William Wimsatt.
250 |a1st ed. 2012.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2012.
300 |aX, 374 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aBoston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,|x2214-7942 ;|v292
505 0 |aIntroduction. The Solidity of Scientific Achievements: Structure of the Problem, Difficulties, Philosophical Implications -- Chapter 1. Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination (1981) -- Chapter 2. Robustness: Material, and Inferential, in the Natural and Human Sciences -- Chapter 3. Achieving Robustness to Confirm Controversial Hypotheses: A Case -- Study in Cell Biology -- Chapter 4. Multiple Derivability and the Reliability and Stabilization of theories -- Chapter 5. Robustness of an Experimental Result: The Example of the Tests of Bell’s Inequalities -- Chapter 6. Scientific Images and Robustness -- Chapter 7. Are we still Babylonians? The Structure of the Foundations of Mathematics from a Wimsattian Perspective Chapter 8. Rerum Concordia Discors: Robustness and Discordant Multimodal -- Evidence -- Chapter 9. Robustness of Results and Robustness of Derivations: the InternalArchitecture of a Solid Experimental Proof -- Chapter 10. Multiple Means of Determination and Multiple Constraints of Construction: Robustness and Strategies for Modeling Macromolecular Objects -- Chapter 11. Understanding Scientific Practices: The Role of Robustness-notions -- Chapter 12. The Robustness of Science and the Dance of Agency -- Chapter 13. Dynamic Robustness and Design in Nature and Artifact Chapter 12. The Robustness of Science and the Dance of Agency -- Chapter 13. Dynamic Robustness and Design in Nature and Artifact.
520 |aMature sciences have been long been characterized in terms of the “successfulness”, “reliability” or “trustworthiness” of their theoretical, experimental or technical accomplishments. Today many philosophers of science talk of “robustness”, often without specifying in a precise way the meaning of this term. This lack of clarity is the cause of frequent misunderstandings, since all these notions, and that of robustness in particular, are connected to fundamental issues, which concern nothing less than the very nature of science and its specificity with respect to other human practices, the nature of rationality and of scientific progress; and science’s claim to be a truth-conducive activity. This book offers for the first time a comprehensive analysis of the problem of robustness, and in general, that of the reliability of science, based on several detailed case studies and on philosophical essays inspired by the so-called practical turn in philosophy of science. Thanks to its rich thematic variety, the book is addressed to the entire science studies community: general philosophers of science, philosophers of physics, biology, cognitive sciences, historians, sociologists and anthropologists of science. As the authors carefully explain all the examples discussed in the book, only a general background of scientific knowledge is presupposed.
650 0|aScience|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aScience|xHistory.
650 0|aSocial sciences.
650 0|aHumanities.
650 0|aTechnology|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aBiology|xPhilosophy.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Science.
650 24|aHistory of Science.
650 24|aHumanities and Social Sciences.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Technology.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Biology.
700 1 |aSoler, Léna.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aTrizio, Emiliano.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aNickles, Thomas.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aWimsatt, William.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400727588
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400727601
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400796430
830 0|aBoston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,|x2214-7942 ;|v292
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2759-5
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
001 813862
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130222921
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 120321s2012 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789400727595|9978-94-007-2759-5
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-007-2759-5|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aQ174-175.3
050 4|aB67
072 7|aPDA|2bicssc
072 7|aSCI075000|2bisacsh
072 7|aPDA|2thema
082 04|a501|223
090 |aDK/15102
245 10|aCharacterizing the Robustness of Science|h[electronic resource] :|bAfter the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science /|cedited by Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles, William Wimsatt.
250 |a1st ed. 2012.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c2012.
300 |aX, 374 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aBoston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,|x2214-7942 ;|v292
505 0 |aIntroduction. The Solidity of Scientific Achievements: Structure of the Problem, Difficulties, Philosophical Implications -- Chapter 1. Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination (1981) -- Chapter 2. Robustness: Material, and Inferential, in the Natural and Human Sciences -- Chapter 3. Achieving Robustness to Confirm Controversial Hypotheses: A Case -- Study in Cell Biology -- Chapter 4. Multiple Derivability and the Reliability and Stabilization of theories -- Chapter 5. Robustness of an Experimental Result: The Example of the Tests of Bell’s Inequalities -- Chapter 6. Scientific Images and Robustness -- Chapter 7. Are we still Babylonians? The Structure of the Foundations of Mathematics from a Wimsattian Perspective Chapter 8. Rerum Concordia Discors: Robustness and Discordant Multimodal -- Evidence -- Chapter 9. Robustness of Results and Robustness of Derivations: the InternalArchitecture of a Solid Experimental Proof -- Chapter 10. Multiple Means of Determination and Multiple Constraints of Construction: Robustness and Strategies for Modeling Macromolecular Objects -- Chapter 11. Understanding Scientific Practices: The Role of Robustness-notions -- Chapter 12. The Robustness of Science and the Dance of Agency -- Chapter 13. Dynamic Robustness and Design in Nature and Artifact Chapter 12. The Robustness of Science and the Dance of Agency -- Chapter 13. Dynamic Robustness and Design in Nature and Artifact.
520 |aMature sciences have been long been characterized in terms of the “successfulness”, “reliability” or “trustworthiness” of their theoretical, experimental or technical accomplishments. Today many philosophers of science talk of “robustness”, often without specifying in a precise way the meaning of this term. This lack of clarity is the cause of frequent misunderstandings, since all these notions, and that of robustness in particular, are connected to fundamental issues, which concern nothing less than the very nature of science and its specificity with respect to other human practices, the nature of rationality and of scientific progress; and science’s claim to be a truth-conducive activity. This book offers for the first time a comprehensive analysis of the problem of robustness, and in general, that of the reliability of science, based on several detailed case studies and on philosophical essays inspired by the so-called practical turn in philosophy of science. Thanks to its rich thematic variety, the book is addressed to the entire science studies community: general philosophers of science, philosophers of physics, biology, cognitive sciences, historians, sociologists and anthropologists of science. As the authors carefully explain all the examples discussed in the book, only a general background of scientific knowledge is presupposed.
650 0|aScience|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aScience|xHistory.
650 0|aSocial sciences.
650 0|aHumanities.
650 0|aTechnology|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aBiology|xPhilosophy.
650 14|aPhilosophy of Science.
650 24|aHistory of Science.
650 24|aHumanities and Social Sciences.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Technology.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Biology.
700 1 |aSoler, Léna.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aTrizio, Emiliano.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aNickles, Thomas.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aWimsatt, William.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400727588
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400727601
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789400796430
830 0|aBoston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science,|x2214-7942 ;|v292
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2759-5
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)
Materyaller
Depodan talep edilen materyal sadece kütüphane içerisinde kullanılmaktadır.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
