LEADER 03711nam a22005655i 4500
001 813976
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130222243
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 130130s2013 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783642331169|9978-3-642-33116-9
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-642-33116-9|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aK4240-4343
072 7|aLNJ|2bicssc
072 7|aLAW000000|2bisacsh
072 7|aLNJ|2thema
082 04|a343.099|223
090 |aDK/15215
245 10|aComparative Issues in the Governance of Research Biobanks|h[electronic resource] :|bProperty, Privacy, Intellectual Property, and the Role of Technology /|cedited by Giovanni Pascuzzi, Umberto Izzo, Matteo Macilotti.
250 |a1st ed. 2013.
264 1|aBerlin, Heidelberg :|bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg :|bImprint: Springer,|c2013.
300 |aVIII, 339 p. 7 illus.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aFrom the contents: Property and Privacy in Biobanking -- Intellectual Property and Biobanks -- Biobanks: The Perspective of Biobanker's.
520 |aIn the last few years, the boom in biobanking has prompted a lively debate on a host of interrelated legal issues, such as the Gordian knot of the ownership of biological materials, as well as privacy concerns. The latter are due to the difficulty of accepting that biological samples must be completely anonymous without making it practically impossible to exploit their information potential. The issues also include the delicate role and the changing content of the donor’s “informed consent” as the main legal tool that may serve to link the privacy and property interests of donors with the research interests and the set of principles that should be at the core of the biobanking practice. Lastly, the IP issues and the patentability of biological samples as well as the protection of databases storing genetic information obtained from the samples are covered. Collecting eighteen essays written by eminent scholars from Italy, the US, the UK and Canada, this book provides new solutions to these problems. From a comparative viewpoint, it explores the extent to which digital technology may assist in tackling the numerous regulatory issues raised by the practice of biobanking for research purposes. These issues may be considered and analyzed under the traditional paradigms of Property, Privacy, Informed Consent and Intellectual Property.
650 0|aInformation technology|xLaw and legislation.
650 0|aMass media|xLaw and legislation.
650 0|aMedicine|xResearch.
650 0|aBiology|xResearch.
650 0|aBioinformatics.
650 0|aMedical laws and legislation.
650 14|aIT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property.
650 24|aBiomedical Research.
650 24|aComputational and Systems Biology.
650 24|aMedical Law.
700 1 |aPascuzzi, Giovanni.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aIzzo, Umberto.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aMacilotti, Matteo.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783642331152
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783642331176
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783642439339
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33116-9
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXLC
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aLaw and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)