LEADER 03863nam a22004935i 4500
001 814208
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130220854
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 130321s1999 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401573863|9978-94-015-7386-3
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-015-7386-3|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aB829.5.A-Z
072 7|aHPCF3|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI018000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQDHR5|2thema
082 04|a142.7|223
090 |aDK/15447
100 1 |aHusserl, Edmund.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 14|aThe Idea of Phenomenology|h[electronic resource] :|bA Translation of Die Idee der Phänomenologie Husserliana II /|cby Edmund Husserl.
250 |a1st ed. 1999.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1999.
300 |aV, 72 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aTranslator’s Introduction -- Lecture I -- Lecture II -- Lecture III -- Lecture IV -- Lecture V -- Addenda -- The Train of Thought in the Lectures.
520 |a3 same lecture he characterizes the phenomenology of knowledge, more specifically, as the "theory of the essence of the pure phenomenon of knowing" (see below, p. 36). Such a phenomenology would advance the "critique of knowledge," in which the problem of knowledge is clearly formulated and the possibility of knowledge rigorously secured. It is important to realize, however, that in these lectures Husserl will not enact, pursue, or develop a phenomenological critique of knowledge, even though he opens with a trenchant statement of the problem of knowledge that such a critique would solve. Rather, he seeks here only to secure the possibility of a phe nomenological critique of knowledge; that is, he attempts to secure the possibility of the knowledge of the possibility of knowledge, not the possibil ity of knowledge in general (see below, pp. 37-39). Thus the work before us is not phenomenological in the straightforward sense, but pre phenomenological: it sets out to identify and satisfy the epistemic require ments of the phenomenological critique of knowledge, not to carry out that critique itself. To keep these two levels of theoretical inquiry distinct, I will call the level that deals with the problem of the possibility of knowledge the "critical level"; the level that deals with the problem of the possibility of the knowledge of the possibility of knowledge the "meta-criticallevel.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aPhenomenology .
650 14|aPhenomenology.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780792355007
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401573870
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7386-3
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)